Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34051836›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2021

Applicability of human-specific STR systems, GlobalFiler™ PCR Amplification Kit, Investigator 24plex QS Kit, and PowerPlex® Fusion 6C in chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes).

Abhishek Singh, Vivek Sahajpal, Mukesh Thakur, Lalit Kumar Sharma, Kailash Chandra, Deepika Bhandari, Arun Sharma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abhishek SinghZoological Survey of India, New Alipore, Kolkata, 700 053, West Bengal, India.
Vivek SahajpalState Forensic Science Laboratory, Directorate of Forensic Services, Junga, Shimla, 171218, Himachal Pradesh, India. viveksahajpal@gmail.com.
Mukesh ThakurZoological Survey of India, New Alipore, Kolkata, 700 053, West Bengal, India. thamukesh@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2609-7579
Lalit Kumar SharmaZoological Survey of India, New Alipore, Kolkata, 700 053, West Bengal, India.
Kailash ChandraZoological Survey of India, New Alipore, Kolkata, 700 053, West Bengal, India.
Deepika BhandariState Forensic Science Laboratory, Directorate of Forensic Services, Junga, Shimla, 171218, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Arun SharmaState Forensic Science Laboratory, Directorate of Forensic Services, Junga, Shimla, 171218, Himachal Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHuman identification systems based on STRs are widely used in human population genetics and forensic analysis. This study aimed to validate the cross-reactivity of three widely known human-specific STR identification systems i.e. GlobalFiler™ PCR Amplification Kit, Investigator 24plex QS Kit, and PowerPlex® Fusion 6C in chimpanzee.

resultsThe present study revealed the successful amplification of 18 loci using GlobalFiler™ PCR Amplification Kit, 18 loci using Investigator 24plex QS Kit, and 20 loci using PowerPlex® Fusion 6C system. The marker Amelogenin (AMEL) showed differential allele size between male and female revealing the gender identity of chimpanzees and thus validates their application concerning forensic examination, population estimation, and genetic analysis.

Indexed as

DNA FingerprintingPan troglodytesAnimalsFemaleGender IdentityHumansMaleMicrosatellite RepeatsPolymerase Chain ReactionChimpanzeeGlobalFiler™ PCR amplification kitHuman identificationInvestigator 24plex QS kitPowerPlex® fusion 6C system

Identifiers

PMID34051836
PMCPMC8164790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.