Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34051768›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Assessing training needs in infectious disease management at major ports, airports and ground-crossings in Europe.

Doret de Rooij, Evelien Belfroid, Christos Hadjichristodoulou, Varvara A Mouchtouri, Jörg Raab, Aura Timen, EU HEALTHY GATEWAYS Joint Action consortium

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Doret de RooijCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands. doret.de.rooij@rivm.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-1922-6021
Evelien BelfroidCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Christos HadjichristodoulouDepartment of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Thessaly, Thessaly, Greece.
Varvara A MouchtouriDepartment of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Thessaly, Thessaly, Greece.
Jörg RaabDepartment of Organization Studies, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Aura TimenCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
EU HEALTHY GATEWAYS Joint Action consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe implementation of core capacities as stated in the International Health Regulations (IHR) is far from complete, and, as the COVID-19 pandemic shows, the spreading of infectious diseases through points of entry (POEs) is a serious problem. To guide training and exercises, we performed a training needs assessment on infectious disease management among professionals at European POE.

methodsWe disseminated a digital questionnaire to representatives of designated airports, ports, and ground-crossings in Europe. Topics were derived from the IHR core capacities for POEs. Based on the importance (4-point Likert scale) and training needs (4-point Likert scale), we identified the topics with the highest priority for training. These results were put in further perspective using prior experience (training < 3 year, exercise < 5 years, events < 5 years). Also, preferences for training methodologies were assessed.

resultsFifty questionnaires were included in the analyses, representing 50 POEs from 19 European countries. Importance is high for 26/30 topics, although scores widely vary among respondents. Topics with a high training need (16/30) are amongst others the handling of ill travelers; using and composing the public health emergency contingency plan, and public health measures. Respondents from ports and airports attribute equal importance to most topics, but respondents from ports showed higher training needs on 75% of the topics. POEs are unevenly and generally little experienced. The most preferred training methods were presentations. Simulation is the preferred methodology for training the handling of ill or exposed travelers.

conclusionsThe European workforce at designated ports, airports and ground-crossings has a different level of experience and perceives varying importance of the topics assessed in our study. We identified the topics on which training is required. We call for European collaboration between POEs to agree upon the importance of infectious disease management, and to jointly build a trained and prepared workforce that is ready to face the next crisis.

Indexed as

AirportsCOVID-19Disease ManagementEuropeHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2AirportEducationExerciseGround-crossingInfectious disease controlPoints of entryPortTrainingTraining needs assessment

Identifiers

PMID34051768
PMCPMC8164056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.