Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34051223›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology2022

Oral anaphylaxis to peanut in a mouse model is associated with gut permeability but not with Tlr4 or Dock8 mutations.

Jake A Gertie, Biyan Zhang, Elise G Liu, Laura R Hoyt, Xiangyun Yin, Lan Xu, Lauren L Long, Arielle Soldatenko, Uthaman Gowthaman, Adam Williams and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Context-dependent regulation of mast cell-mediated food allergy in C57BL/6J mice.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Mouse Models of Food Allergies: Where Do They Take Us?Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Feast for thought: A comprehensive review of food allergy 2021-2023.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jake A GertieDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn; Department of Immunobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.
Biyan ZhangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn; Department of Immunobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn; Singapore Immunology Network (SIgN), Singapore.
Elise G LiuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn; Department of Immunobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn; Section of Rheumatology, Allergy & Immunology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.
Laura R HoytDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn; Department of Immunobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.
Xiangyun YinDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn; Department of Immunobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.
Lan XuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn; Department of Immunobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.
Lauren L LongThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, Conn.
Arielle SoldatenkoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn; Department of Immunobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.
Uthaman GowthamanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn; Department of Immunobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn; Department of Pathology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Mass.
Adam WilliamsThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, Conn; Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Conn. Electronic address: adam.williams@jax.org.
Stephanie C EisenbarthDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn; Department of Immunobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn; Section of Rheumatology, Allergy & Immunology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. Electronic address: stephanie.eisenbarth@yale.edu.
Yale University · USJackson Laboratory · USSingapore Immunology Network · SGUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN INVESTIGATIVE RHEUMATOLOGYT32AR007107 · NIAMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI RICHARD J BUCALA · 1986 to 2026
$7.5M
Short-Term Reserch Training: Students in Health SchoolsT35HL007649 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Sarwat I Chaudhry, Erica L Herzog · 1987 to 2026
$5.7M
Immune Mechanisms Regulating AllergyR01AI136942 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Stephanie Caroline Eisenbarth, ADAM WILLIAMS · 2018 to 2026
$5.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NHLBI NIH HHS T35 HL007649NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI136942NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR007107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe etiology of food allergy is poorly understood; mouse models are powerful systems to discover immunologic pathways driving allergic disease. C3H/HeJ mice are a widely used model for the study of peanut allergy because, unlike C57BL/6 or BALB/c mice, they are highly susceptible to oral anaphylaxis. However, the immunologic mechanism of this strain's susceptibility is not known.

objectiveWe aimed to determine the mechanism underlying the unique susceptibility to anaphylaxis in C3H/HeJ mice. We tested the role of deleterious Toll-like receptor 4 (Tlr4) or dedicator of cytokinesis 8 (Dock8) mutations in this strain because both genes have been associated with food allergy.

methodsWe generated C3H/HeJ mice with corrected Dock8 or Tlr4 alleles and sensitized and challenged them with peanut. We then characterized the antibody response to sensitization, anaphylaxis response to both oral and systemic peanut challenge, gut microbiome, and biomarkers of gut permeability.

resultsIn contrast to C3H/HeJ mice, C57BL/6 mice were resistant to anaphylaxis after oral peanut challenge; however, both strains undergo anaphylaxis with intraperitoneal challenge. Restoring Tlr4 or Dock8 function in C3H/HeJ mice did not protect from anaphylaxis. Instead, we discovered enhanced gut permeability resulting in ingested allergens in the bloodstream in C3H/HeJ mice compared to C57BL/6 mice, which correlated with an increased number of goblet cells in the small intestine.

conclusionsOur work highlights the potential importance of gut permeability in driving anaphylaxis to ingested food allergens; it also indicates that genetic loci outside of Tlr4 and Dock8 are responsible for the oral anaphylactic susceptibility of C3H/HeJ mice.

Indexed as

Passive Cutaneous AnaphylaxisAdministration, OralAnimalsArachisDisease Models, AnimalFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGuanine Nucleotide Exchange FactorsIntestinal MucosaMaleMiceMice, Inbred C3HMice, Inbred C57BLMutationPeanut HypersensitivityDock8 protein, mouseGuanine Nucleotide Exchange FactorsTlr4 protein, mouseToll-Like Receptor 4anaphylaxisC3H/HeJDOCK8food allergygut permeabilitypeanutTLR4

Identifiers

PMID34051223
PMCPMC8626534
OpenAlexW3164117306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.