Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34051137›Full record

Trial reportCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2022

Tongue conservation treatment for oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma with induction chemotherapy, surgery, and risk-adapted adjuvant therapy: A phase II trial.

Tsung-Lun Lee, Pei-Yin Wei, Muh-Hwa Yang, Peter Mu-Hsin Chang, Ling-Wei Wang, Shyh-Kuan Tai

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tsung-Lun LeeDepartment of Otolaryngology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Pei-Yin WeiDepartment of Otolaryngology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Muh-Hwa YangInfection and Immunity Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Peter Mu-Hsin ChangOncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ling-Wei WangOncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shyh-Kuan TaiDepartment of Otolaryngology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-5644-3589
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWTaipei Veterans General Hospital · TWMinistry of Health and Welfare · KR

Funding

Ministry of Health and Welfare, Center of Excellence for Cancer Research MOHW107-TDU-B-211-114019Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 105-2628-B-010-014-MY3Taipei Veterans General Hospital V105C-026Taipei Veterans General Hospital V106C-003Taipei Veterans General Hospital V107C-061, V110C-032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo assess the feasibility of tongue conservation treatment with induction chemotherapy (ICT), tongue conservation surgery, and risk-adapted postoperative adjuvant therapy in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC).

methodsPatients with newly diagnosed OTSCC cT2-4 N0-2 M0 were recruited. The ICT with a regimen of docetaxel, cisplatin, and oral tegafur/uracil (DCU) was administrated every 21 days. After the first cycle of ICT (DCU1), patients with a more than 30% decrease in the longest diameter of primary tumor underwent a second cycle of ICT (DCU2). Tongue conservation surgery was performed after ICT, and risk-adapted adjuvant therapy was organized based on pathological features.

resultsFrom July 2011 to December 2015, a total of 23 patients were enrolled, 87% of whom were classified as stage III-IV. Clinical responders to DCU1 and DCU2 were determined in 90.5% (19/21) and 88.2% (15/17) of patients. Tongue conservation surgery was performed in 16 responders to ICT. Only one patient had a positive margin (6.3%), and a complete pathologic response was achieved in eight patients (50%). Only one patient developed local recurrence after a median follow-up of 58.6 months (range, 7.9-105.2). The 5-year overall survival (0% vs. 87.5%, P = 0.001) and disease-specific survival (0% vs. 93.3%, P = 0.000) were significantly different between the DCU1 nonresponders and responders.

conclusionTongue conservation treatment with ICT, followed by conservation surgery and risk-adapted adjuvant therapy, is feasible for patients with OTSCC who are good responders to ICT. However, the outcomes of nonresponders are dismal. Further study in a larger patient population is warranted.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Squamous CellChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansInduction ChemotherapyMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOral Surgical ProceduresSurvival RateTongue Neoplasmscomplete pathologic responseinduction chemotherapyOral tongue squamous cell carcinomarisk-adapted adjuvant therapytongue conservation surgery

Identifiers

PMID34051137
PMCPMC8842695
OpenAlexW3165137992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.