Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34050902›Full record

ArticleJournal of echocardiography2021

Differences in echocardiography interpretation techniques among trainees and expert readers.

David Roy Anderson, Sarah Blissett, Patricia O'Sullivan, Atif Qasim

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of echocardiography, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Artificial intelligence automation of echocardiographic measurements.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Local large language models for privacy-preserving accelerated review of historic echocardiogram reports.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Gaze patterns reflect and predict expertise in dynamic echocardiographic imaging.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023
    Article
  10. Variability in echocardiography interpretation.Journal of echocardiography · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

David Roy Anderson, 505 Parnassus Ave. M1182, Box 0124, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA. David.anderson2@ucsf.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8085-5345
Sarah BlissettLondon Health Sciences Centre, 339 Windermere Rd B6 177A, London, ON, N6A 5A5, Canada.
Patricia O'Sullivan, 533 Parnassus Ave. Suite U-80, Box 0710, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Atif Qasim, 505 Parnassus Ave., Box 0214, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
London Health Sciences Centre · CAParsons (United States) · USUniversity of California San Francisco Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTrainees learn transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) interpretation through independently completing and reviewing selected portions of the study with experts. The diagnostic accuracy of novice TTE interpretation is known to be low and schema for reading TTEs systematically are lacking. The purpose of our study is to identify techniques experts use while reading TTEs which could be used to more effectively teach novice readers.

methodsWe performed a prospective qualitative case study to observe how experts and trainees interpret TTEs in an academic institution using a concurrent think aloud (CTA) method. Three TTEs of intermediate complexity were given to 3 advanced imaging fellows, 3 first year fellows and 3 expert TTE readers Participants filled out a report while reading and described aloud their thought processes. Sessions were video and audiotaped for analysis.

resultsExperts and advanced fellows used specific techniques that novices did not including: previewing studies, reviewing multiple images simultaneously, having flexibility in image review order and disease coding, and saving hardest elements to code for the end. Direct observation of TTE reading informed trainee inefficiencies and was a well-received educational tool.

conclusionsIn this single centered study we identified several unique approaches experts use to interpret TTEs which may be teachable to novices. Although limited in generalizability the findings of this study suggests that a more systematic approach to TTE interpretation, using techniques found in experts, might be of significant value for trainees. Further study is needed to evaluate teaching practices at other institutions and to assess whether implementation of these techniques by novices improves can improve their diagnostic accuracy and efficiency of reading at an earlier stage in their training.

Indexed as

EchocardiographyHumansProspective StudiesAdult echocardiogramConcurrent think aloud (CTA) methodFellowshipMedical educationQualitative case studyTraineesTransthoracic echocardiogram (TTE)

Identifiers

PMID34050902
PMCPMC8556165
OpenAlexW3164504849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.