ArticleNeurotoxicity research2021
Botulinum Injections for Idiopathic Cervical Dystonia: a Longitudinal Study.
Article in Neurotoxicity research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Observational
- Article
- Patient Perceptions of a Preventive Effect of Long-Term Botulinum Neurotoxin Therapy in Cervical Dystonia.Toxins · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparison of Guided and Unguided Botulinum Injections for Cervical Dystonia: EMG, Ultrasound, and Anatomic Landmarks.CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2025Article
- Comparison of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia Before and After Botulinum Toxin Injection in Cervical Dystonia.Dysphagia · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Botulinum toxin (BT) injections into the cervical muscles are an effective and commonly practiced treatment approach for cervical dystonia. In this retrospective longitudinal study, we collected data from the Sheba electronic medical records on consecutive patients with idiopathic cervical dystonia (ICD), treated regularly with periodic BT injections between the years 2008-2020. All treatment visits were analyzed regarding type of toxin, dose injected, and clinical outcomes. The vast majority of patients were treated with abobotulinum toxin A. Sixty-four ICD patients (51 (79.7%) females, onset at age 45.8 ± 13.7 years) were treated over 17.1 ± 13.9 (range 3 to 49) visits per patient; BT treatment efficacy increased gradually from initial treatment sessions to visit 13, when it achieved a steady state. While the subjective report of percentage improvement and its duration were around 78.9 ± 17.1% for 2.8 ± 1.0 months, respectively, the dose of BT increased significantly over the years (p = 0.006). Side effects (SE) were not rare, and commonly recurred after subsequent sessions and were usually mild and short-lasting, with dysphagia being the most common (~17.5%), followed by neck/arm weakness (11.9%) and cervical pain (8.9%). Repeated injections of BT for ICD remain beneficial for patients over several years of therapy, and despite mild SE, patients tend to adhere to a 3-4 months interval schedule.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.