Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34050897›Full record

ArticleDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2021

A Guideline-Based Decision Tree Achieves Better Glucose Control with Less Hypoglycemia at 3 Months in Chinese Diabetic Patients.

Yingying Luo, Hong Wu, Xiyang Liao, Tingting Zhao, Nan Cui, Aihua Li, Xingzhi Sun, Puhong Zhang, Yahua Huang, Xia Zhang and 2 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01525693 unknown statusnot on this map

Evaluation of Effectiveness of Treatment Paradigm for Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Patients in China (NEW2D STUDY) A Study Of China Cardiometabolic Registries (CCMR)

TypeobservationalSponsorChina Cardiometabolic RegistriesRan2012 to 2014Enrolled5,000ConditionsType 2 Diabetes
NCT01859598 completednot on this map

A Prospective, Observational Registry Study Focusing on the Real World Use, Effectiveness and Safety of Initial Basal Insulin Regimen in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Uncontrolled by Oral Antidiabetic Drugs in China

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorThe George Institute for Global Health, ChinaRan2011 to 2014Enrolled19,894ConditionsDiabetes
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yingying LuoDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hong WuSanofi (China) Investment, Shanghai, China.
Xiyang LiaoPing An Healthcare Technology, Beijing, China.
Tingting ZhaoPing An Healthcare Technology, Beijing, China.
Nan CuiSanofi (China) Investment, Shanghai, China.
Aihua LiSanofi (China) Investment, Shanghai, China.
Xingzhi SunPing An Healthcare Technology, Beijing, China.
Puhong ZhangThe George Institute for Global Health at Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
Yahua HuangSanofi (China) Investment, Shanghai, China.
Xia ZhangSanofi (China) Investment, Shanghai, China.
Huiqiu YinSanofi (China) Investment, Shanghai, China.
Linong JiDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China. jiln@bjmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChina has the world's largest diabetes epidemic and has been facing a serious shortage of primary care providers for chronic diseases including diabetes. To help primary care physicians follow guidelines and mitigate the workload in primary care communities in China, we developed a guideline-based decision tree. This study aimed to validate it at 3 months with real-world data.

methodsThe decision tree was developed based on the 2017 Chinese Type 2 Diabetes (T2DM) guideline and 2018 guideline for primary care. It was validated with the data from two registry studies: the NEW2D and ORBIT studies. Patients' data were divided into two groups: the compliance and non-compliance group, depending on whether the physician's prescription was consistent with the decision tree or not. The primary outcome was the difference of change in HbA1c from baseline to 3 months between the two groups. The secondary outcomes included the difference in the proportion of patients achieving HbA1c < 7% at 3 months between the two groups, the incidence of self-reported hypoglycemia at 3 months, and the proportion of patients (baseline HbA1c ≥ 7%) with a HbA1c reduction ≥ 0.3%. The statistical analysis was performed using linear or logistic regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting with adjustments of confounding factors.

resultsThere was a 0.9% reduction of HbA1c in the compliance group and a 0.8% reduction in the non-compliance group (P < 0.001); 61.1% of the participants in the compliance group and 44.3% of the participants in the non-compliance group achieved a HbA1c level < 7% at 3 months (P < 0.001). The hypoglycemic events occurred in 7.1% of patients in the compliance group vs. 9.4% in the non-compliance group (P < 0.001).

conclusionThe decision tree can help physicians to treat their patients so that they achieve their glycemic targets with fewer hypoglycemic risks. ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01525693 & NCT01859598).

Indexed as

Decision treeDiabetesGlucose controlGuidelineHypoglycemia

Identifiers

PMID34050897
PMCPMC8266924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.