ArticleClinical oral investigations2022
Evaluation of the dimensions, morphology, and position of the mandibular condyles in individuals with neurofibromatosis 1: a case-control study.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A case of suspected neurofibromatosis type 1 in monozygotic 13-year-old twins with submucosal cleft palate.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Temporomandibular joint ankylosis following bimaxillary surgery in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1: a case report.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2025Article
- Mandibular symmetry on posterior-anterior cephalograms of neurofibromatosis type 1 patients with facial plexiform neurofibroma.GMS Interdisciplinary plastic and reconstructive surgery DGPW · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the mandibular condyles of neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) individuals without facial plexiform neurofibroma using cone beam computed tomography images. MATERIALS AND
methodsEighty cone beam computed tomography scans (160 mandibular condyles) were analyzed: 40 from NF1 individuals (study group) and 40 from individuals without NF1 (control group). The anteroposterior and mediolateral dimensions, height, and volume of the mandibular condyles were measured. The mandibular condyles were classified according to their morphology: healthy (absence of morphological changes), with flattening (loss of rounded contour of at least one of the surfaces), with erosion (loss of continuity of the cortical bone), with osteophyte (exophytic formation of the condyle surface), and with sclerosis (any increase in the cortical thickness in the load-bearing areas). Furthermore, the position of the mandibular condyles in relation to the joint fossa in an anteroposterior view was classified as anterior, concentric, or posterior.
resultsThe study group had a higher anteroposterior dimension of the mandibular condyles compared with the control group (p < 0.05). There were no differences in condylar morphology and position between both groups (p > 0.05). The morphological alterations were not associated with sex or age in any group evaluated (p > 0.05). For both groups, the concentric position was the most common. For the study group, there was a significant difference in the condylar position between the sides (p < 0.05).
conclusionsNF1 individuals without facial plexiform neurofibroma present a high prevalence of condyles with a large anteroposterior dimension and asymmetric position in the joint fossa. However, no morphological and volumetric changes were observed in the mandibular condyles of them. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The knowledge of the TMJ alterations in individuals with NF1 is important to establish an evaluation protocol, which would allow early intervention if indicated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.