Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34050817›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2022

Role of denosumab before resection and reconstruction in giant cell tumors of bone: a single-centered retrospective cohort study.

Badaruddin Sahito, Sheikh Muhammad Ebad Ali, Dileep Kumar, Jagdesh Kumar, Nauman Hussain, Tahir Lakho

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Clinical Outcomes of CurettageRevista brasileira de ortopedia · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Badaruddin SahitoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Dr Ruth KM Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi/Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Sheikh Muhammad Ebad AliDepartment of Orthopaedics Unit II, Dr Ruth KM Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi, Baba e Urdu Road, Saddar, Karachi, Pakistan. sheikh.muhammadebadali14@dmc.duhs.edu.pk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0371-5197
Dileep KumarDepartment of Orthopaedics, Dr Ruth KM Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi/Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Jagdesh KumarDepartment of Orthopaedics, Dr Ruth KM Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi/Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Nauman HussainDepartment of Orthopaedics, Dr Ruth KM Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi/Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Tahir LakhoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Dr Ruth KM Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi/Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Civil Hospital Karachi · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDenosumab has been approved by Food and Drug Authority in 2013 for use in surgically unresectable Giant cell tumor (GCT) to achieve resectable tumor margins. The aim of this study is to investigate the functional outcome and surgical convenience with the use of neoadjuvant denosumab before resection and reconstruction in Campanacci grade III GCT.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 70 cases of Campanacci grade III GCT receiving resection and reconstruction between January 2014 and December 2019. They were stratified into two groups: one group of 29 patients received once-weekly denosumab 120 mg for 4-weeks before resection and reconstruction, while the other group of 41 patients did not receive denosumab before resection and reconstruction. Quality of life by musculoskeletal tumor society score where 0-7 means poor, 8-14 means fair, 15-22 means good; above 22 means excellent, incidence of tumor recurrence, intraoperative duration in minutes and postoperative positive margins were assessed for each cohort after 12 months follow-up.

resultsThere was no significant difference in musculoskeletal tumor society score (25.75 vs. 27.41; P  = 0.178), incidence of recurrence (3.45% vs. 4.88%; P  < 0.001), and postoperative positive margins (10.34% vs. 4.88%; P  = 0.38) for both groups. However, the intraoperative duration (133.38 vs. 194.49; P  < 0.001) was significantly higher in the non-denosumab group compared with denosumab group.

conclusionsNeoadjuvant denosumab is equally effective considering postoperative functional outcomes and surgical convenience except intraoperative duration where it is highly helpful in saving the operating time duration. Easier identification, resection and lesser reconstruction are the key surgical convenience offered by neoadjuvant denosumab.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsDenosumabGiant Cell Tumor of BoneBone Density Conservation AgentsHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabBone tumorsDenosumabGiant cell tumorNeoplasiaTumor surgery

Identifiers

PMID34050817
OpenAlexW3164073565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.