Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34050803›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

Brain metabolic characteristics distinguishing typical and atypical benign epilepsy with centro-temporal spikes.

Yuting Li, Jianhua Feng, Teng Zhang, Kexin Shi, Yao Ding, Xiaohui Zhang, Chentao Jin, Jiayue Pan, Le Xue, Yi Liao and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  3. [European radiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Yuting LiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Medical PET Center, The Second Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 88 Jiefang Road, Zhejiang, 310009, Hangzhou, China.
Jianhua FengDepartment of Pediatrics, The Second Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Teng ZhangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Medical PET Center, The Second Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 88 Jiefang Road, Zhejiang, 310009, Hangzhou, China.
Kexin ShiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Medical PET Center, The Second Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 88 Jiefang Road, Zhejiang, 310009, Hangzhou, China.
Yao DingDepartment of Neurology, Epilepsy Center, The Second Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Xiaohui ZhangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Medical PET Center, The Second Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 88 Jiefang Road, Zhejiang, 310009, Hangzhou, China.
Chentao JinDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Medical PET Center, The Second Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 88 Jiefang Road, Zhejiang, 310009, Hangzhou, China.
Jiayue PanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Medical PET Center, The Second Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 88 Jiefang Road, Zhejiang, 310009, Hangzhou, China.
Le XueDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Medical PET Center, The Second Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 88 Jiefang Road, Zhejiang, 310009, Hangzhou, China.
Yi LiaoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Medical PET Center, The Second Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 88 Jiefang Road, Zhejiang, 310009, Hangzhou, China.
Xiawan WangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Medical PET Center, The Second Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 88 Jiefang Road, Zhejiang, 310009, Hangzhou, China.
Cheng ZhuoCollege of Information Science & Electronic Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Hong ZhangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Medical PET Center, The Second Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 88 Jiefang Road, Zhejiang, 310009, Hangzhou, China. hzhang21@zju.edu.cn.
Mei TianDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Medical PET Center, The Second Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 88 Jiefang Road, Zhejiang, 310009, Hangzhou, China. meitian@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2020FZZX001-05National Natural Science Foundation of China 81725009National Natural Science Foundation of China 82030049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAtypical benign epilepsy with centro-temporal spikes (BECTS) have less favorable outcomes than typical BECTS, and thus should be accurately identified for adequate treatment. We aimed to investigate the glucose metabolic differences between typical and atypical BECTS using

methodsForty-six patients with typical BECTS, 31 patients with atypical BECTS and 23 controls who underwent [

resultsThe |AI| was found significantly higher in atypical BECTS than in typical BECTS (p = 0.040). Atypical BECTS showed more hypo-metabolism regions than typical BECTS, mainly located in the fronto-temporo-parietal cortex. The PET model had significantly higher area under the curve (AUC) than the clinical model (0.91 vs. 0.70, p = 0.006). The hybrid model had the highest sensitivity (0.90), specificity (0.85), and accuracy (0.87) of all three models.

conclusionsAtypical BECTS showed more widespread and severe hypo-metabolism than typical BECTS, depending on which the two groups can be well distinguished. The combination of metabolic characteristics and clinical variables has the potential to be used clinically to distinguish between typical and atypical BECTS. KEY POINTS: • Distinguishing between typical and atypical BECTS is very important for the formulation of treatment regimens in clinical practice. • Atypical BECTS showed more widespread and severe hypo-metabolism than typical BECTS, mainly located in the fronto-temporo-parietal cortex. • The logistic regression model based on PET outperformed that based on clinical characteristics in classification of typical and atypical BECTS, and the hybrid model achieved the best classification performance.

Indexed as

Epilepsy, RolandicBrainElectroencephalographyFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansPositron-Emission TomographyRetrospective StudiesFluorodeoxyglucose F18ClassificationEpilepsyLogistic modelsPositron emission tomography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.