ArticleBrain structure & function2021
Phase fMRI defines brain resting-state functional hubs within central and posterior regions.
Article in Brain structure & function, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early development of the functional brain network in newborns.Brain structure & function · 2023Article
- Brain intrinsic magnetic susceptibility mapping depicts whole-brain functional connectivity balance of normal aging in lifespan.Brain structure & function · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
From a brain functional connectivity (FC) matrix, we can identify the hub nodes by a new method of eigencentrality mapping, which not only counts for one node's centrality but also all other nodes' centrality values through correlation connections in an eigenvector of the FC matrix. For the resting-state functional MRI (fMRI) data (complex-valued EPI images in nature), both magnitude and phase images are useful for brain FC analysis. We herein report on brain functional hubness analysis by constructing the FC matrix from phase fMRI data and identifying the hub nodes by eigencentrality mapping. In our study, we collected a cohort of 160 complex-valued fMRI dataset (consisting of magnitude and phase in pairs), and performed independent component analysis (ICA), FC matrix calculation (in size of 50 × 50) and FC matrix eigen decomposition; thereby obtained the 50-node eigencentrality values in the eigenvector associated with the largest eigenvalue. We also compared the hub structures inferred from FC matrices under different thresholding. Alternatively, we obtained the geometric hubs among p value the 50 nodes involved in the FC matrix through the use of harmonic centrality metric. Our results showed that phase fMRI data analysis defines the resting-state brain functional hubs primarily in the central region (subcortex) and the posterior region (parieto-occipital lobes and cerebella). The brain central hubness was supported by the geometric central hubness, which, however, is distinct from the magnitude-inferred hubness in brain superior region (frontal and parietal lobes). Our findings pose a new understanding of (or a debate over) brain functional connectivity architecture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34050790What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.