Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34050676›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2021

Heterogeneous delivery across the blood-brain barrier limits the efficacy of an EGFR-targeting antibody drug conjugate in glioblastoma.

Bianca-Maria Marin, Kendra A Porath, Sonia Jain, Minjee Kim, Jason E Conage-Pough, Ju-Hee Oh, Caitlyn L Miller, Surabhi Talele, Gaspar J Kitange, Shulan Tian and 20 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. NAR cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Antibody-conjugated polymer nanoparticles for brain cancer.Drug delivery and translational research · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Hypoxia Imaging as a Radiomics Signature in Tumors Using NovelbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Preclinical Modeling of Navtemadlin Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy in IDH-Wild-type Glioblastoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Bianca-Maria MarinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Kendra A PorathDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Sonia JainDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Minjee KimDepartment of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Jason E Conage-PoughDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Ju-Hee OhDepartment of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Caitlyn L MillerDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Surabhi TaleleDepartment of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Gaspar J KitangeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Shulan TianDepartment of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Danielle M BurgenskeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Ann C MladekDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Shiv K GuptaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Paul A DeckerDepartment of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Madison H McMinnDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sylwia A StopkaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Michael S ReganDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Lihong HeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Brett L CarlsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Katrina BakkenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Terence C BurnsDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Ian F ParneyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Caterina GianniniDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Nathalie Y R AgarDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jeanette E Eckel-PassowDepartment of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Jennifer R CochranDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
William F ElmquistDepartment of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Rachael A VaubelDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Forest M WhiteDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Jann N SarkariaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Mayo Clinic · USUniversity of Minnesota · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USStanford University · US

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI AKHILESH PANDEY · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
Image Guided Therapy Center - Ultrasound-based sensor system for the monitoring of COVID-19 patientsP41EB015898 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI TEMPANY, CLARE M · 2012 to 2021
$18.9M
TRD 3 - Enabling Technologies for Intraprocedural GuidanceP41EB028741 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Carl-Fredrik Westin · 2021 to 2026
$10.7M
Trans Network ProjectU54CA210180 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI WHITE, FOREST M · 2016 to 2020
$10.2M
Role of RBBP4/p300 Complex in Recovery from therapy induced DNA damage in glioblastomaR01CA233522 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI KITANGE, GASPAR JULIUS · 2020 to 2024
$1.8M
Training in Image Guidance, Precision Diagnosis and TherapyT32EB025823 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Fiona Fennessy, Lauren Jean O'Donnell · 2019 to 2026
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS R01 CA233522NCI NIH HHS U54 CA210180NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015898NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB028741NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB025823
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibody drug conjugates (ADCs) targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), such as depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M), is a promising therapeutic strategy for glioblastoma (GBM) but recent clinical trials did not demonstrate a survival benefit. Understanding the mechanisms of failure for this promising strategy is critically important.

methodsPDX models were employed to study efficacy of systemic vs intracranial delivery of Depatux-M. Immunofluorescence and MALDI-MSI were performed to detect drug levels in the brain. EGFR levels and compensatory pathways were studied using quantitative flow cytometry, Western blots, RNAseq, FISH, and phosphoproteomics.

resultsSystemic delivery of Depatux-M was highly effective in nine of 10 EGFR-amplified heterotopic PDXs with survival extending beyond one year in eight PDXs. Acquired resistance in two PDXs (GBM12 and GBM46) was driven by suppression of EGFR expression or emergence of a novel short-variant of EGFR lacking the epitope for the Depatux-M antibody. In contrast to the profound benefit observed in heterotopic tumors, only two of seven intrinsically sensitive PDXs were responsive to Depatux-M as intracranial tumors. Poor efficacy in orthotopic PDXs was associated with limited and heterogeneous distribution of Depatux-M into tumor tissues, and artificial disruption of the BBB or bypass of the BBB by direct intracranial injection of Depatux-M into orthotopic tumors markedly enhanced the efficacy of drug treatment.

conclusionsDespite profound intrinsic sensitivity to Depatux-M, limited drug delivery into brain tumor may have been a key contributor to lack of efficacy in recently failed clinical trials.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaImmunoconjugatesPharmaceutical PreparationsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBlood-Brain BarrierCell Line, TumorErbB ReceptorsHumansAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsImmunoconjugatesPharmaceutical Preparationsantibody drug conjugatesblood-brain barrierDepatux-MEGFRglioblastoma

Identifiers

PMID34050676
PMCPMC8643472
OpenAlexW3164568596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.