Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34050598›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS2021

Robotic surgery can be safely performed for patients and healthcare workers during COVID-19 pandemic.

Peter Sparwasser, Maximillian P Brandt, Maximillian Haack, Robert Dotzauer, Katharina Boehm, Mohammed Kamal Gheith, Rene Mager, Wolfgang Jäger, Alexander Ziebart, Thomas Höfner and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Robotic Appendicectomy: A review of feasibility.Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Surgical safety in the COVID-19 era: present and future considerations.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter SparwasserDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8469-8113
Maximillian P BrandtDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Maximillian HaackDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Robert DotzauerDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Katharina BoehmDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Mohammed Kamal GheithDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Rene MagerDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Wolfgang JägerDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Alexander ZiebartDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Thomas HöfnerDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Igor TsaurDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Axel HaferkampDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Hendrik BorgmannDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the safety of robotic surgery during COVID-19 pandemic concerning new-acquired COVID-19 infections for patients and healthcare workers. PATIENTS: We performed a retrospective single-centre cohort study of patients undergoing robotic surgery in initial period of COVID-19 pandemic. Patients and healthcare workers COVID-19 infection status was assessed by structured telephone follow-up and/or repeated nasopharyngeal swabs.

resultsAfter 61 robotic surgeries (93,5% cancer surgery), one patient (1.6%) had COVID-19 infection. Sixty healthcare workers cumulatively exposed to 1187 h of robotic surgery had no infection. One patient with postoperative proof of SARS-CoV-2 had complete recovery. After this potentially contagious robotic surgery, eight healthcare workers had no COVID-19 infection after follow-up with each three nasopharyngeal swabs.

conclusionsEarly clinical experience of robotic surgery during COVID-19 pandemic shows that robotic surgery can be safely performed for patients and healthcare workers. Despite our results we recommend elective surgery only for verified COVID-19 negative patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19Robotic Surgical ProceduresAgedFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-22019-nCoVcoronavirusinfectionroboticssafetySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34050598
PMCPMC8209902
OpenAlexW3164730784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.