Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34050578›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2021

Comparison of Genomic Characterization in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma and Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder.

Kaiwei Yang, Wei Yu, Huanhuan Liu, Feng Ding, Yanrui Zhang, Yun Zhang, Wang Wang, Feng Lou, Shanbo Cao, Huina Wang and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. PARP Inhibitors in Genitourinary Cancer: A New Paradigm Beyond Prostate Cancer.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kaiwei Yang *Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Wei Yu *Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Huanhuan LiuAcornmed Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Feng DingAcornmed Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yanrui ZhangAcornmed Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yun ZhangAcornmed Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Wang WangAcornmed Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Feng LouAcornmed Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Shanbo CaoAcornmed Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Huina Wang *Acornmed Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Zhisong He *Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Peking University · CNPeking University First Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferent genomic characterization in urothelial carcinoma (UC) by site of origin may imply contrasting therapeutic opportunities and pathogenetic mechanisms. The aim of this study was to investigate whether differences between upper tract UC (UTUC) and UC of the bladder (UCB) result from intrinsic biological diversity. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe prospectively sequenced 118 tumors and matched blood DNA from Chinese patients with UC using next-generation sequencing techniques, including 45 UTUC and 73 UCB. Two hundred twenty-six patients with UTUC and 350 patients with UCB for The Cancer Genome Atlas were acquired from the cbioportal.

resultsThere were marked disparities in the mutational landscape for UC according to race and site of origin. Signature 22 for exposure to aristolochic acid was only observed in the UTUC cohort. Conversely, signature 6 for defective DNA mismatch repair only existed in the UCB cohort. Compared with UCB, UTUC had higher clonal and subclonal mutation numbers. TP53, PIK3CA, and FGFR3 mutations may be the driver genes for UTUC, whereas for UCB, the driver gene may be BRCA1. Patients with UTUC had lower PD-L1 than those with UCB. There was no significant difference in the number of DDR mutations, copy number variation counts, and tumor mutational burden between UTUC and UCB.

conclusionUTUC and UCB exhibit significant differences in the prevalence of genomic landscape and carcinogenesis. Consequently, molecular subtypes differ according to location, and these results may imply the site-specific management of patients with urothelial carcinoma. Mutational signature may be used as a screening tool to assist clinical differential diagnosis between UTUC and UCB. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study's findings lay the foundation for a deeper understanding of distinct molecular mechanisms and similar treatment opportunities between upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) and had important implications for the site-specific management of patients with urothelial carcinoma. A comprehensive understanding of the biology of UTUC and UCB is needed to identify new drug targets in order to improve clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsDNA Copy Number VariationsGenomicsHumansGenomic characterizationMarkerMutational signatureUpper tract urothelial carcinomaUrothelial carcinoma of the bladder

Identifiers

PMID34050578
PMCPMC8342585
OpenAlexW3163993478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.