Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34050446›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2021

Potentially pathogenic bacteria isolated from Paipa cheese and its susceptibility profiles to antibiotics and biocides.

José Castellanos-Rozo, Rubén Pérez Pulido, Mª José Grande, Rosario Lucas, Antonio Gálvez

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Intestinal and Extraintestinal Pathotypes ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

José Castellanos-RozoDepartment of Biology and Microbiology, Faculty of Sciences and Engineering, Universidad de Boyacá, 150003, Tunja, Colombia.
Rubén Pérez PulidoMicrobiology Division, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Experimental Sciences, University of Jaén, 23071, Jaén, Spain.
Mª José GrandeMicrobiology Division, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Experimental Sciences, University of Jaén, 23071, Jaén, Spain.
Rosario LucasMicrobiology Division, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Experimental Sciences, University of Jaén, 23071, Jaén, Spain.
Antonio GálvezMicrobiology Division, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Experimental Sciences, University of Jaén, 23071, Jaén, Spain. agalvez@ujaen.es.
Universidad de Jaén · ESUniversity of Boyaca · CO

Funding

Universidad de Jaén AGR-230
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this work was to evaluate the microbiological quality of cheese produced by formal and informal micro-enterprises in Paipa, Colombia, to isolate potentially pathogenic bacteria and to determine their prevalence and resistance to antimicrobials such as antibiotics and biocides. Sixteen micro-enterprises of the seventy existing in the region were sampled during 3 years. Viable concentrations of aerobic mesophiles, total and fecal coliforms, Salmonella sp., Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus sp., yeasts, and molds were determined. Seventy-three bacterial isolates were identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The susceptibility of the isolates to antibiotics and biocides was determined. The results indicated that between 98 and 100% of the cheese samples (n = 48 samples) of formal and informal micro-enterprises presented populations of total and fecal coliforms and Staphylococcus sp. above the limits established by Colombian regulations and varied according to the micro-enterprise. The results also indicated that 56% of Staphylococcus isolates were S. aureus. L. monocytogenes was positive in 38% of the samples. Salmonella sp. was not detected. The coliforms that prevailed were Escherichia coli (25%), Citrobacter freundii (14%), and Proteus mirabilis (8%). All L. monocytogenes were sensitive to ampicillin but resistant to erythromycin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. S. aureus isolates were susceptible to most antibiotics, except tetracycline and erythromycin (7% resistance). Likewise, 30% of coliforms (n = 36) were multidrug-resistant to antibiotics but susceptible to biocides.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCheeseDisinfectantsFood ContaminationFood MicrobiologyCitrobacter freundiiColombiaEscherichia coliListeria monocytogenesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsProteus mirabilisRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSalmonellaStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsDisinfectantsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAntimicrobial resistanceColiformsListeriaMicrobiological qualitySalmonellaStaphylococcus

Identifiers

PMID34050446
PMCPMC8324605
OpenAlexW3163996253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.