ReviewBriefings in functional genomics2021
Pretraining model for biological sequence data.
Review in Briefings in functional genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- LKE-DTA: predicting drug-target binding affinity with large language model representations and knowledge graph embeddings.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- Review
- SiaScoreNet: a siamese neural network-based model integrating prediction scores for HLA-peptide interaction prediction.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- Article
- Attention is all you need: utilizing attention in AI-enabled drug discovery.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Review
- Deep-learning based approach to identify substrates of human E3 ubiquitin ligases and deubiquitinases.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- PRIP: A Protein-RNA Interface Predictor Based on Semantics of Sequences.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- MILNP: Plant lncRNA-miRNA Interaction Prediction Based on Improved Linear Neighborhood Similarity and Label Propagation.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Intelligent host engineering for metabolic flux optimisation in biotechnology.The Biochemical journal · 2021Review
- AI applications in functional genomics.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the development of high-throughput sequencing technology, biological sequence data reflecting life information becomes increasingly accessible. Particularly on the background of the COVID-19 pandemic, biological sequence data play an important role in detecting diseases, analyzing the mechanism and discovering specific drugs. In recent years, pretraining models that have emerged in natural language processing have attracted widespread attention in many research fields not only to decrease training cost but also to improve performance on downstream tasks. Pretraining models are used for embedding biological sequence and extracting feature from large biological sequence corpus to comprehensively understand the biological sequence data. In this survey, we provide a broad review on pretraining models for biological sequence data. Moreover, we first introduce biological sequences and corresponding datasets, including brief description and accessible link. Subsequently, we systematically summarize popular pretraining models for biological sequences based on four categories: CNN, word2vec, LSTM and Transformer. Then, we present some applications with proposed pretraining models on downstream tasks to explain the role of pretraining models. Next, we provide a novel pretraining scheme for protein sequences and a multitask benchmark for protein pretraining models. Finally, we discuss the challenges and future directions in pretraining models for biological sequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.