Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34050261›Full record

Trial reportLeukemia2021

Lymphoma and multiple myeloma in cohorts of persons exposed to ionising radiation at a young age.

Mark P Little, Richard Wakeford, Lydia B Zablotska, David Borrego, Keith T Griffin, Rodrigue S Allodji, Florent de Vathaire, Choonsik Lee, Alina V Brenner, Jeremy S Miller and 9 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Leukemia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 11 institutions in 6 countries.

Mark P Little *Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. mark.little@nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0980-7567
Richard Wakeford *Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, Institute of Population Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Lydia B ZablotskaDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0778-1108
David BorregoRadiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9868-5113
Keith T GriffinRadiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9628-3791
Rodrigue S AllodjiEquipe d'Epidémiologie des radiations, Unité 1018 INSERM, Bâtiment B2M, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif Cedex, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1895-8415
Florent de VathaireEquipe d'Epidémiologie des radiations, Unité 1018 INSERM, Bâtiment B2M, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif Cedex, France.
Choonsik LeeRadiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Alina V BrennerRadiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima City, Japan.
Jeremy S MillerInformation Management Services, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
David CampbellInformation Management Services, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Siegal SadetzkiIsrael Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel.
Michele M DoodyRadiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Erik HolmbergDepartment of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden.
Marie LundellDepartment of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Michael Jacob AdamsUniversity of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
Benjamin FrenchDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Martha S LinetRadiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Amy Berrington de GonzalezRadiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
National Cancer Institute · USInformation Management Services · USInserm · FRKarolinska University Hospital · SERadiation Effects Research Foundation · JPSahlgrenska University Hospital · SESheba Medical Center · ILUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of Rochester · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Multidisciplinary Studies of LymphomaZIACP010170 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI MORTON, LINDSAY · 2009 to 2025
$10.7M
Canadian Fluoroscopy Cohort Study: Lifespan Mortality and Incidence Follow-UpR01CA197422 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ZABLOTSKA, LYDIA B · 2016 to 2020
$3.4M
Risk of hematologic cancers from repeated low-dose diagnostic radiationR03CA188614 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ZABLOTSKA, LYDIA B · 2014 to 2015
$158k
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA CP010170NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197422NCI NIH HHS R03 CA188614
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is limited evidence that non-leukaemic lymphoid malignancies are radiogenic. As radiation-related cancer risks are generally higher after childhood exposure, we analysed pooled lymphoid neoplasm data in nine cohorts first exposed to external radiation aged <21 years using active bone marrow (ABM) and, where available, lymphoid system doses, and harmonised outcome classification. Relative and absolute risk models were fitted. Years of entry spanned 1916-1981. At the end of follow-up (mean 42.1 years) there were 593 lymphoma (422 non-Hodgkin (NHL), 107 Hodgkin (HL), 64 uncertain subtype), 66 chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) and 122 multiple myeloma (MM) deaths and incident cases among 143,136 persons, with mean ABM dose 0.14 Gy (range 0-5.95 Gy) and mean age at first exposure 6.93 years. Excess relative risk (ERR) was not significantly increased for lymphoma (ERR/Gy = -0.001; 95% CI: -0.255, 0.279), HL (ERR/Gy = -0.113; 95% CI: -0.669, 0.709), NHL + CLL (ERR/Gy = 0.099; 95% CI: -0.149, 0.433), NHL (ERR/Gy = 0.068; 95% CI: -0.253, 0.421), CLL (ERR/Gy = 0.320; 95% CI: -0.678, 1.712), or MM (ERR/Gy = 0.149; 95% CI: -0.513, 1.063) (all p-trend > 0.4). In six cohorts with estimates of lymphatic tissue dose, borderline significant increased risks (p-trend = 0.02-0.07) were observed for NHL + CLL, NHL, and CLL. Further pooled epidemiological studies are needed with longer follow-up, central outcome review by expert hematopathologists, and assessment of radiation doses to lymphoid tissues.

Indexed as

Radiation, IonizingAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLymphomaMaleMultiple MyelomaNeoplasms, Radiation-InducedPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID34050261
PMCPMC8484030
OpenAlexW3165644716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.