Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34049916›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Impact of The Daily Mile on children's physical and mental health, and educational attainment in primary schools: iMprOVE cohort study protocol.

Bina Ram, Anna Chalkley, Esther van Sluijs, Rachel Phillips, Tishya Venkatraman, Dougal S Hargreaves, Russell M Viner, Sonia Saxena

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bina RamFaculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK b.ram@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0023-1573
Anna ChalkleySchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1163-6210
Esther van SluijsMRC Epidemiology Unit, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
Rachel PhillipsFaculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3634-7845
Tishya VenkatramanFaculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6171-2384
Dougal S HargreavesFaculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Russell M VinerInstitute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3047-2247
Sonia SaxenaFaculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3787-2083

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKMedical Research Council MC_UU_00006/5Medical Research Council MC_UU_12015/7Medical Research Council MR/K023187/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 087636/Z/08/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSchool-based active mile initiatives such as The Daily Mile (TDM) are widely promoted to address shortfalls in meeting physical activity recommendations. The iMprOVE Study aims to examine the impact of TDM on children's physical and mental health and educational attainment throughout primary school. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: iMprOVE is a longitudinal quasi-experimental cohort study. We will send a survey to all state-funded primary schools in Greater London to identify participation in TDM. The survey responses will be used for non-random allocation to either the intervention group (Daily Mile schools) or to the control group (non-Daily Mile schools). We aim to recruit 3533 year 1 children (aged 5-6 years) from 77 primary schools and follow them up annually until the end of their primary school years. Data collection taking place at baseline (children in school year 1) and each primary school year thereafter includes device-based measures of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and questionnaires to measure mental health (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire) and educational attainment (ratings from 'below expected' to 'above expected levels'). The primary outcome is the mean change in MVPA minutes from baseline to year 6 during the school day among the intervention group compared with controls. We will use multilevel linear regression models adjusting for sociodemographic data and participation in TDM. The study is powered to detect a 10% (5.5 min) difference between the intervention and control group which would be considered clinically significant. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics has been approved from Imperial College Research Ethics Committee, reference 20IC6127. Key findings will be disseminated to the public through research networks, social, print and media broadcasts, community engagement opportunities and schools. We will work with policy-makers for direct application and impact of our findings.

Indexed as

Mental HealthSchoolsChildCohort StudiesEducational StatusExerciseHumansSchool Health Servicescommunity child healthepidemiologypublic health

Identifiers

PMID34049916
PMCPMC8166593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.