SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2021
Accuracy of pancreatic stone protein for the diagnosis of infection in hospitalized adults: a systematic review and individual patient level meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Serum Pancreatic Stone Protein Across the Spectrum of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: Discrimination of Preeclampsia Compared with Conventional Inflammatory Indices.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Pancreatic Stone Protein as an Emerging Biomarker in Paediatric Nosocomial and Postoperative Sepsis: An Integrative Review of Diagnostic and Prognostic Performance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Comparison of serial pancreatic stone protein, C-reactive protein and procalcitonin for the diagnosis of infection and sepsis in critically Ill patients: a multicentre prospective study.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Circulating and Respiratory Biomarkers in Sepsis-Induced ARDS: Diagnostic and Prognostic Insights - A Narrative Review.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Pancreatic Stone Protein as a Versatile Biomarker: Current Evidence and Clinical Applications.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in the Prognosis of Sepsis: A Current Update.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Regenerating island-derived protein 3E concentrations in healthy dogs and dogs with various inflammatory processes.PloS one · 2025Article
- Controversial Roles of Regenerating Family Proteins in Tissue Repair and Tumor Development.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Sepsis Biomarkers: Advancements and Clinical Applications-A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- The Possible Pathophysiological Role of Pancreatic Stone Protein in Sepsis and Its Potential Therapeutic Implication.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Ability of Pancreatic Stone Protein: A Scoping Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- The critically ill older patient with sepsis: a narrative review.Annals of intensive care · 2024Review
- [Research advances on application of pancreatic stone protein in the early diagnosis of sepsis].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2023Review
- The Role of the Pancreatic Stone Protein in Predicting Intra-Abdominal Infection-Related Complications: A Prospective Observational Single-Center Cohort Study.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the Kinetics of Pancreatic Stone Protein as a Predictor of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- The Role of Pancreatic Stone Protein (PSP) as a Biomarker of Pregnancy-Related Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Serum Pancreatic Stone Protein Reference Values in Healthy Pregnant Women: A Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Biomarkers as Prognostic Predictors and Therapeutic Guide in Critically Ill Patients: Clinical Evidence.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- The critical role of pancreatic stone protein/regenerating protein in sepsis-related multiorgan failure.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate biomarkers to diagnose infection are lacking. Studies reported good performance of pancreatic stone protein (PSP) to detect infection. The objective of the study was to determine the performance of PSP in diagnosing infection across hospitalized patients and calculate a threshold value for that purpose.
methodsA systematic search across Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and MEDLINE databases (1966-March 2019) for studies on PSP published in English using 'pancreatic stone protein', 'PSP', 'regenerative protein', 'lithostatin' combined with 'infection' and 'sepsis' found 44 records. The search was restricted to the five trials that evaluated PSP for the initial detection of infection in hospitalized adults. Individual patient data were obtained from the investigators of all eligible trials. Data quality and validity was assessed according to PRISMA guidelines. We choose a fixed-effect model to calculate the PSP cut-off value that best discriminates infected from non-infected patients.
resultsInfection was confirmed in 371 of 631 patients. The median (IQR) PSP value of infected versus uninfected patients was 81.5 (30.0-237.5) versus 19.2 (12.6-33.57) ng/ml, compared to 150 (82.70-229.55) versus 58.25 (15.85-120) mg/l for C-reactive protein (CRP) and 0.9 (0.29-4.4) versus 0.15 (0.08-0.5) ng/ml for procalcitonin (PCT). Using a PSP cut-off of 44.18 ng/ml, the ROC AUC to detect infection was 0.81 (0.78-0.85) with a sensitivity of 0.66 (0.61-0.71), specificity of 0.83 (0.78-0.88), PPV of 0.85 (0.81-0.89) and NPV of 0.63 (0.58-0.68). When a model combining PSP and CRP was used, the ROC AUC improved to 0.90 (0.87-0.92) with higher sensitivity 0.81 (0.77-0.85) and specificity 0.84 (0.79-0.90) for discriminating infection from non-infection. Adding PCT did not improve the performance further.
conclusionsPSP is a promising biomarker to diagnose infections in hospitalized patients. Using a cut-off value of 44.18 ng/ml, PSP performs better than CRP or PCT across the considered studies. The combination of PSP with CRP further enhances its accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.