Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34049574›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2021

Evaluation of the EQ-5D-3L and 5L versions in low back pain patients.

A M Garratt, H Furunes, C Hellum, T Solberg, J I Brox, K Storheim, L G Johnsen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01704677 (Lumbar Disc Prosthesis Versus Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation in Chronic Back Pain and Localized Degenerative Disc. Long Term Follow-up of a Randomized Multicentre Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01704677 nacompletednot on this map

Lumbar Disc Prosthesis Versus Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation in Chronic Back Pain and Localized Degenerative Disc. Long Term Follow-up of a Randomized Multicentre Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2012 to 2015Enrolled151ConditionsChronic Low Back PainArmsLumbar total disc replacement, Multidisciplinary rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Sensitivity to change of generic preference-based instruments (EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, and HUI3) in the context of treatment for people with prescription-type opioid use disorder in Canada.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Trial
  7. A Hospital Avoidance Pathway With Digitally Supported Follow-Up for Low Back Pain: An Alternative to Emergency Department Care.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Factors associated with preoperative health-related quality of life in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery: a multi-ethnic Asian cohort.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Subjects suffering from bipolar disorder taking lithium are less likely to report physical pain: a FACE-BD study.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2023
    Article
  19. The Norwegian registry for spine surgery (NORspine): cohort profile.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

A M GarrattDivision for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway. andrew.garratt@fhi.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1000-4780
H FurunesDepartment of Surgery, Innlandet Hospital Gjøvik, Gjøvik, Norway.
C HellumDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
T SolbergDepartment of Neurosurgery and The Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery (NORspine), University Hospital of Northern Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
J I BroxUniversity of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
K StorheimResearch and Communication Unit for Musculoskeletal Health (FORMI), Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
L G JohnsenDepartment of Neuromedicine, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NONorwegian Institute of Public Health · NONorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOUniversity Hospital of North Norway · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

Norges Forskningsrå 262673
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe EuroQol EQ-5D is one of the most widely researched and applied patient-reported outcome measures worldwide. The original EQ-5D-3L and more recent EQ-5D-5L include three and five response categories respectively. Evidence from healthy and sick populations shows that the additional two response categories improve measurement properties but there has not been a concurrent comparison of the two versions in patients with low back pain (LBP).

methodsLBP patients taking part in a multicenter randomized controlled trial of lumbar total disc replacement and conservative treatment completed the EQ-5D-3L and 5L in an eight-year follow-up questionnaire. The 3L and 5L were assessed for aspects of data quality including missing data, floor and ceiling effects, response consistency, and based on a priori hypotheses, associations with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Pain-Visual Analogue Scales and Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-25).

resultsAt the eight-year follow-up, 151 (87%) patients were available and 146 completed both the 3L and 5L. Levels of missing data were the same for the two versions. Compared to the EQ-5D-5L, the 3L had significantly higher floor (pain discomfort) and ceiling effects (mobility, self-care, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression). For these patients the EQ-5D-5L described 73 health states compared to 28 for the 3L. Shannon's indices showed the 5L outperformed the 3L in tests of classification efficiency. Correlations with the ODI, Pain-VAS and HSCL-25 were largely as hypothesized, the 5L having slightly higher correlations than the 3L.

conclusionThe EQ-5D assesses important aspect of health in LBP patients and the 5L improves upon the 3L in this respect. The EQ-5D-5L is recommended in preference to the 3L version, however, further testing in other back pain populations together with additional measurement properties, including responsiveness to change, is recommended.

trial registrationretrospectively registered: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01704677 .

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesEQ-5D-3LEQ-5D-5LLow back painPatient reported outcome measuresPROMsPsychometricsQuality of lifeValidity

Identifiers

PMID34049574
PMCPMC8160396
OpenAlexW3124648432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.