ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2021
High through-plane resolution CT imaging with self-supervised deep learning.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhancing Super-Resolution Network Efficacy in CT Imaging: Cost-Effective Simulation of Training Data.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2025Article
- Deformable motion compensation in interventional cone-beam CT with a context-aware learned autofocus metric.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Super-Resolution Processing of Synchrotron CT Images for Automated Fibre Break Analysis of Unidirectional Composites.Polymers · 2023Article
- Reference-free learning-based similarity metric for motion compensation in cone-beam CT.Physics in medicine and biology · 2022Article
- Article
- CST: A Multitask Learning Framework for Colorectal Cancer Region Mining Based on Transformer.BioMed research international · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
CT images for radiotherapy planning are usually acquired in thick slices to reduce the imaging dose, especially for pediatric patients, and to lessen the need for contouring and treatment planning on more slices. However, low through-plane resolution may degrade the accuracy of dose calculations. In this paper, a self-supervised deep learning workflow is proposed to synthesize high through-plane resolution CT images by learning from their high in-plane resolution features. The proposed workflow was designed to facilitate neural networks to learn the mapping from low-resolution (LR) to high-resolution (HR) images in the axial plane. During the inference step, the HR sagittal and coronal images were generated by feeding two parallel-trained neural networks with the respective LR sagittal and coronal images to the trained neural networks. The CT simulation images of a cohort of 75 patients with head and neck cancer (1 mm slice thickness) and 200 CT images of a cohort of 20 lung cancer patients (3 mm slice thickness) were retrospectively investigated in a cross-validation manner. The HR images generated with the proposed method were qualitatively (visual quality, image intensity profiles and preliminary observer study) and quantitatively (mean absolute error, edge keeping index, structural similarity index measurement, information fidelity criterion and visual information fidelity in pixel domain) inspected, while taking the original CT images of the head and neck and lung cancer patients as the reference. The qualitative results showed the capability of the proposed method for generating high through-plane resolution CT images with data from both groups of cancer patients. All the improvements in the measure metrics were confirmed to be statistically significant with paired two-sample
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.