Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34048935›Full record

ArticleTravel medicine and infectious disease

Successful containment of a flight-imported COVID-19 outbreak through extensive contact tracing, systematic testing and mandatory quarantine: Lessons from Vietnam.

Ha-Linh Quach, Ngoc-Anh Thi Hoang, Cong Khanh Nguyen, Quang Thai Pham, Cong Dinh Phung, Nhu Duong Tran, Quynh Mai Thi Le, Duy Nghia Ngu, Anh Tu Tran, Ngoc Quang La and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Travel medicine and infectious disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ha-Linh QuachDepartment of Communicable Diseases Control, National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi, Viet Nam; National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Ngoc-Anh Thi HoangDepartment of Communicable Diseases Control, National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi, Viet Nam; National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Cong Khanh NguyenDepartment of Communicable Diseases Control, National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi, Viet Nam. Electronic address: nck@nihe.org.vn.
Quang Thai PhamDepartment of Communicable Diseases Control, National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi, Viet Nam; Institute of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
Cong Dinh PhungNational Agency for Science and Technology Information, Ministry of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
Nhu Duong TranNational Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
Quynh Mai Thi LeNational Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
Duy Nghia NguDepartment of Communicable Diseases Control, National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
Anh Tu TranDepartment of Communicable Diseases Control, National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
Ngoc Quang LaHa Noi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
Dai Quang TranGeneral Department of Preventive Medicine, Ministry of Health, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
Trong Tai NguyenInstitute of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
Florian VogtNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia; The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Duc Anh DangNational Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi, Viet Nam.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe importation of SARS-CoV-2 through air travel poses substantial risks to generate new COVID-19 outbreaks. Timely contact tracing is particularly crucial to limit onwards transmission in settings without established community transmission.

methodsWe conducted an in-depth analysis of the response to a big flight-associated COVID-19 outbreak in Vietnam in March 2020 that involved contact tracing, systematic testing and strict quarantine up to third generation contacts.

results183 primary contacts from the flight as well as 1000 secondary and 311 third generation contacts were traced, tested, and quarantined across 15 provinces across Vietnam. The protracted confirmation of the index case at 3 days and 19 h after arrival resulted in isolation/quarantine delays of 6.8 days (IQR 6.3-6.8) and 5.8 days (IQR 5.8-7.0) for primary and secondary cases, respectively, which generated 84.0 and 26.4 person-days of community exposure from primary and secondary cases, respectively. Nevertheless, only 5 secondary cases occurred.

conclusionsA large flight-related COVID-19 cluster was successfully contained through timely, systematic and comprehensive public health responses despite delayed index case identification. Multiagency collaboration and pre-established mechanisms are crucial for low and middle income countries like Vietnam to limit community transmission after COVID-19 importation through air travel.

Indexed as

Contact TracingCOVID-19 TestingCOVID-19Disease OutbreaksFederal GovernmentHumansQuarantineSARS-CoV-2VietnamAir travelCase importationCluster containmentContact tracingCOVID-19Vietnam

Identifiers

PMID34048935
PMCPMC8149171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.