Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34048752›Full record

ArticleContraception2021

Improving assessment of demand for postpartum tubal ligation among publicly insured women in Texas.

Joseph E Potter, Kristen L Burke, Kathleen Broussard, Kristine Hopkins, Daniel Grossman, Kari White

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph E PotterPopulation Research Center, University of Texas, Austin, TX, United States. Electronic address: joe@prc.utexas.edu.
Kristen L BurkePopulation Research Center, University of Texas, Austin, TX, United States.
Kathleen BroussardPopulation Research Center, University of Texas, Austin, TX, United States.
Kristine HopkinsPopulation Research Center, University of Texas, Austin, TX, United States.
Daniel GrossmanAdvancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, (ANSIRH), Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San, Francisco, Oakland, CA, United States.
Kari WhitePopulation Research Center, University of Texas, Austin, TX, United States.
Ibis Reproductive Health · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Population Research CenterR24HD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI UMBERSON, DEBRA J. · 2002 to 2016
$8.4M
Scientific & Technical CoreP2CHD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Elizabeth T. Gershoff · 2017 to 2026
$5.2M
Factors influencing vasectomy useK01HD079563 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI WHITE, KARI L · 2015 to 2018
$522k
NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD079563NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042849NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD042849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess an alternative method for estimating demand for postpartum tubal ligation and evaluate reproductive trajectories of low-income women who did not obtain a desired procedure. STUDY

designIn a 2-year cohort study of 1700 publicly insured women who delivered at 8 hospitals in Texas, we identified those who had an unmet demand for tubal ligation prior to discharge from the hospital. We classified unmet demand as explicit or prompted based on survey questions that included a prompt regarding whether the respondent would like to have had a tubal ligation at the time of delivery. We assessed persistence of demand for permanent contraception, contraceptive use, and repeat pregnancies among all study participants who wanted but did not get a postpartum procedure.

resultsSome 426 women desired a postpartum tubal ligation; 219 (51%) obtained one prior to discharge. Among the 207 participants with unmet demand, 62 (30%) expressed an explicit preference for the procedure, while 145 (70%) were identified from the prompt. Most with unmet demand still wanted permanent contraception 3 months after delivery (156/184), but only 23 had obtained interval procedures. By 18 months, the probability of a woman with unmet demand conceiving a pregnancy that she would likely carry to term was 12.5% (95% CI: 8.3%-18.5%).

conclusionsThe majority of unmet demand for postpartum tubal ligation among publicly insured women in Texas was uncovered via a prompt and would not have been evident in clinical records or from consent forms. Women unable to obtain a desired procedure had a substantial chance of pregnancy within 18 months after delivery. IMPLICATIONS: Estimates of unmet demand for postpartum tubal ligation based on clinical records and consent forms likely underestimate desire for permanent contraception. Among low-income women in Texas, those with unmet demand for postpartum tubal ligation require improved access to effective contraception.

Indexed as

Sterilization, TubalCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMedicaidPostpartum PeriodPregnancyTexasContraceptionFamily planningFemale sterilizationPermanent contraceptionPostpartumSterilizationTexasTubal ligation

Identifiers

PMID34048752
PMCPMC10348345
OpenAlexW3164518376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.