ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2021
User involvement in the making: Positions and types of knowledge enacted in the interaction between service users and researchers in user panel meetings.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Users' Perspectives on the Organization of Rehabilitation Services - A Focus Group Study of User Organization Representatives in Norway.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- Between Public Guidelines for User Involvement and Ideals About Free Research: Using Collaborative Autoethnography to Explore Researcher Experiences From a User Involvement Process.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- Growing and fostering knowledge translation: Recommendations for health organisations from the SPHERE Envisionarium.Heliyon · 2024Article
- What motivates public collaborators to become and stay involved in health research?Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- Article
- Patient and public involvement in Nordic healthcare research: a scoping review of contemporary practice.Research involvement and engagement · 2023Article
- Research involvement and engagement of adolescent and young adults in a cancer trajectory: a 5-year experience from a patient support facility at a university hospital.Research involvement and engagement · 2023Article
- User Involvement in Myasthenia Gravis Research.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- User involvement in the making: Positions and types of knowledge enacted in the interaction between service users and researchers in user panel meetings.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNumerous studies of user involvement in research have been conducted. However, there is a lack of studies applying observational methods and addressing the concrete practice of involvement.
objectiveTo determine what knowledge types and competences users apply when involved in the research process through user panel meetings.
designUser panel meetings in a qualitative project in rehabilitation were sound-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data analysis applied an abductive approach framed by positioning theory. SETTING AND
participantsSix rehabilitation service users and a similar number of researchers met 20 times during a six-year project period. They discussed various issues in the research process such as interview guides, analysis and dissemination of results.
findingsThe service users combined their respective knowledge and competence into six positions enacted in the panel interactions. They engaged as co-researchers, based their contributions on their respective personal histories, represented an NGO and peers, applied their respective professional and educational backgrounds and, finally, engaged as concerned citizens. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionThe findings add to the discussion of professionalization of user involvement by introducing a wider array of positions enacted than do the findings of previous studies. Researchers recruiting user panel members, as well as NGOs appointing candidates for user panels, are advised to consider a wide competence profile for possible candidates. A panel is also considered as a resource in confirming and elaborating on a study's findings. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: A service user panel contributed to the study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.