Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34048599›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2021

Association of frailty with outcomes in individuals with COVID-19: A living review and meta-analysis.

Flavia Dumitrascu, Karina E Branje, Emily S Hladkowicz, Manoj Lalu, Daniel I McIsaac

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Emergency hernia hospitalizations in older adults with and without multimorbidity.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The association of technology acceptance and physical activity on frailty in older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic period.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2023
    Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Flavia DumitrascuSchool of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Karina E BranjeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.
Emily S HladkowiczDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.
Manoj LaluDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.
Daniel I McIsaacDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8543-1859
University of Ottawa · CAOttawa Hospital · CAQueen's University · CARoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesFrailty leaves older adults vulnerable to adverse health outcomes. Frailty assessment is recommended by multiple COVID-19 guidelines to inform care and resource allocation. We aimed to identify, describe, and synthesize studies reporting the association of frailty with outcomes (informed by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Triple Aim [health, resource use, and experience]) in individuals with COVID-19.

designSystematic review and meta-analysis.

settingStudies reporting associations between frailty and outcomes in the setting of COVID-19 diagnosis.

participantsAdults with COVID-19. MEASUREMENTS: Following review of titles, abstracts and full text, we included 52 studies that contained 118,373 participants with COVID-19. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognostic studies tool. Our primary outcome was mortality, secondary outcomes included delirium, intensive care unit admission, need for ventilation and discharge location. Where appropriate, random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool adjusted and unadjusted effect measures by frailty instrument.

resultsThe Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) was the most used frailty instrument. Mortality was reported in 37 studies. After confounder adjustment, frailty identified using the CFS was significantly associated with mortality in COVID-19 positive patients (odds ratio 1.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.49-2.14; hazard ratio 1.87, 95% CI 1.33-2.61). On an unadjusted basis, frailty identified using the CFS was significantly associated with increased odds of delirium and reduced odds of intensive care unit admission. Results were generally consistent using other frailty instruments. Patient-reported, cost and experience outcomes were rarely reported.

conclusionFrailty is associated with a substantial increase in mortality risk in COVID-19 patients, even after adjustment. Delirium risk is also increased. Frailty assessment may help to guide prognosis and individualized care planning, but data relating frailty status to patient-reported outcomes are urgently needed to provide a more comprehensive overview of outcomes relevant to older adults.

Indexed as

SARS-CoV-2Severity of Illness IndexAgedAged, 80 and overCOVID-19FemaleFrail ElderlyFrailtyHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleOdds RatioPatient AdmissionPrognosisCOVID-19frailtyliving reviewoutcomes

Identifiers

PMID34048599
PMCPMC8242611
OpenAlexW3164995039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.