Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34048532›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular research2022

Vascular histopathology and connective tissue ultrastructure in spontaneous coronary artery dissection: pathophysiological and clinical implications.

Marios Margaritis, Francesca Saini, Ania A Baranowska-Clarke, Sarah Parsons, Aryan Vink, Charley Budgeon, Natalie Allcock, Bart E Wagner, Nilesh J Samani, Jan von der Thüsen and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Arterial dissections: Common features and new perspectives.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Marios MargaritisDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences and National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4734-4519
Francesca SainiDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences and National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5756-8869
Ania A Baranowska-ClarkeDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences and National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0827-6792
Sarah ParsonsDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1238-1360
Aryan VinkDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9371-8788
Charley BudgeonDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences and National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1910-5561
Natalie AllcockDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences and National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0234-1450
Bart E WagnerElectron Microscopy, Histopathology Department, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1244-3063
Nilesh J SamaniDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences and National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK.
Jan von der ThüsenDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9699-4860
Jan Lukas RobertusDepartment of Pathology, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, SW3 6NP, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0433-7965
Mary N SheppardCRY Department of Cardiovascular Pathology, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St Georges Medical School, London SW17 0RE, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2724-3881
David AdlamDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences and National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0080-9884
Glenfield Hospital · GBErasmus MC · NLRoyal Brompton Hospital · GBRoyal Hallamshire Hospital · GBThe University of Western Australia · AUUniversity of Leicester · GBUtrecht University · NLVictorian Institute of Forensic Medicine · AU

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/13/96/3060Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsSpontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a cause of acute coronary syndromes and in rare cases sudden cardiac death (SCD). Connective tissue abnormalities, coronary inflammation, increased coronary vasa vasorum (VV) density, and coronary fibromuscular dysplasia have all been implicated in the pathophysiology of SCAD but have not previously been systematically assessed. We designed a study to investigate the coronary histological and dermal collagen ultrastructural findings in SCAD. METHODS AND

resultsThirty-six autopsy SCAD cases were compared with 359 SCAD survivors. Coronary and myocardial histology and immunohistochemistry were undertaken. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of dermal extracellular matrix (ECM) components of n = 31 SCAD survivors and n = 16 healthy volunteers were compared. Autopsy cases were more likely male (19% vs. 5%; P = 0.0004) with greater proximal left coronary involvement (56% vs. 18%; P < 0.0001) compared to SCAD survivors. N = 24 (66%) of cases showed no myocardial infarction on macro- or microscopic examination consistent with arrhythmogenic death. There was significantly (P < 0.001) higher inflammation in cases with delayed-onset death vs. sudden death and significantly more inflammation surrounding the dissected vs. non-dissected vessel segments. N = 17 (47%) cases showed limited intimal fibro-elastic thickening but no features of fibromuscular dysplasia and no endothelial or internal elastic lamina abnormalities. There were no differences in VV density between SCAD and control cases. TEM revealed no general ultrastructural differences in ECM components or markers of fibroblast metabolic activity.

conclusionsAssessment of SCD requires careful exclusion of SCAD, particularly in cases without myocardial necrosis. Peri-coronary inflammation in SCAD is distinct from vasculitides and likely a reaction to, rather than a cause for SCAD. Coronary fibromuscular dysplasia or increased VV density does not appear pathophysiologically important. Dermal connective tissue changes are not common in SCAD survivors.

Indexed as

Coronary Vessel AnomaliesFibromuscular DysplasiaMyocardial InfarctionVascular DiseasesConnective TissueCoronary AngiographyCoronary VesselsHumansInflammationMaleAutopsyCollagenElectron microscopyHaematomaInflammationSpontaneous coronary artery dissectionSudden cardiac deathVascular

Identifiers

PMID34048532
PMCPMC9215198
OpenAlexW3164012901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.