Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34048356›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Professional Social Media Usage and Work Engagement Among Professionals in Finland Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Four-Wave Follow-Up Study.

Reetta Oksa, Markus Kaakinen, Nina Savela, Jari J Hakanen, Atte Oksanen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. COVID-19 Anxiety and Wellbeing at Work in Finland during 2020-2022: A 5-Wave Longitudinal Survey Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. COVID-19 Anxiety-A Longitudinal Survey Study of Psychological and Situational Risks among Finnish Workers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Reetta Oksa *Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-8007-4653
Markus Kaakinen *Institute of Criminology and Legal Policy, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-7067-1665
Nina Savela *Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-7042-6889
Jari J Hakanen *Work Ability and Working Careers, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-7740-6568
Atte Oksanen *Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-4143-5580

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has changed work life profoundly and concerns regarding the mental well-being of employees' have arisen. Organizations have made rapid digital advancements and have started to use new collaborative tools such as social media platforms overnight.

objectiveOur study aimed to investigate how professional social media communication has affected work engagement before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and the role of perceived social support, task resources, and psychological distress as predictors and moderators of work engagement.

methodsNationally representative longitudinal survey data were collected in 2019-2020, and 965 respondents participated in all 4 surveys. Measures included work engagement, perceived social support and task resources, and psychological distress. The data were analyzed using a hybrid linear regression model.

resultsWork engagement remained stable and only decreased in autumn 2020. Within-person changes in social media communication at work, social support, task resources, and psychological distress were all associated with work engagement. The negative association between psychological distress and work engagement was stronger in autumn 2020 than before the COVID-19 outbreak.

conclusionsThe COVID-19 pandemic has exerted pressure on mental health at work. Fostering social support and task resources at work is important in maintaining work engagement. Social media communication could help maintain a supportive work environment.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsWork EngagementAdultDisease OutbreaksFemaleFinlandFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMental HealthPsychological DistressSocial MediaSocial SupportWorkplaceCOVID-19engagementmental healthmoderatorpredictorpsychological distresssocial mediasocial supportsupporttask resourcesusagework engagement

Identifiers

PMID34048356
PMCPMC8208471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.