Trial reportThe American journal of sports medicine2021
Effectiveness of Adding a Large Dose of Shoulder Strengthening to Current Nonoperative Care for Subacromial Impingement: A Pragmatic, Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial (SExSI Trial).
Trial report in The American journal of sports medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02747251 (The Effects of Additional Home-based Strengthening Exercises in Shoulder Impingement Rehabilitation), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effects of Additional Home-based Strengthening Exercises in Shoulder Impingement Rehabilitation (The SEXSI-Trial): A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of seven types of exercise in the treatment of rotator cuff-related shoulder pain (RCRSP): a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Pooled it
- Are Orthopaedic Clinical Trials Linguistically and Culturally Diverse? A Systematic Review.JBJS reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Level of pain catastrophising determines if patients with long-standing subacromial impingement benefit from more resistance exercise: predefined secondary analyses from a pragmatic randomised controlled trial (the SExSI Trial).British journal of sports medicine · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Making Sense of Shoulder Exercise: Measuring the Accuracy of an Artificial Intelligence Model to Classify Shoulder Exercise via Wearable Sensors Among People With and Without Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy.European journal of sport science · 2026Article
- Mechanism of Action of Therapeutic Exercise in Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: What Does Elastography Add?Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Relationship between changes in neuromuscular factors and disability outcomes following a resistance exercise intervention in rotator cuff tendinopathy.Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology · 2025Article
- The Effect of Adding a Large Dose of Shoulder Strengthening to Nonoperative Care for Subacromial Impingement on Shoulder Disability, Quality of Life, Sick Days, and Surgery Rates: 1-Year Results From a Pragmatic, Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial (SExSI).Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Relationship Between Tendon Tissue and Shoulder Disability Change During an 8-Week Exercise Intervention for Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: An Observational Study.Physical therapy · 2025Observational
- Impact of a Decision Aid on Perceptions of Shared Decision-Making in the Primary Care Management of Patients With Subacromial Pain Syndrome: A Two-Phased Multi-Methods Study.Musculoskeletal care · 2025Article
- The Role of Home-Based Exercise in Managing Common Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Narrative Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Review
- Painful considerations in exercise-management for rotator cuff related shoulder pain: a scoping review on pain-related prescription parameters.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- What are the predictors of response to physiotherapy in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears? Gaining expert consensus using an international e-Delphi study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Effects of Yi Jin Bang versus conventional exercise therapy in people with subacromial pain syndrome: A randomized controlled trial.Journal of exercise science and fitness · 2024Article
- Identifying Conservative Interventions for Individuals with Subacromial Pain Syndrome Prior to Undergoing a Subacromial Decompression: A Scoping Review.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2023Article
- The influence of exercise on clinical pain and pain mechanisms in patients with subacromial pain syndrome.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2022Article
- Short-term effectiveness of high-load compared with low-load strengthening exercise on self-reported function in patients with hypermobile shoulders: a randomised controlled trial.British journal of sports medicine · 2022Article
- Writing up your clinical trial report for a scientific journal: the REPORT trial guide for effective and transparent research reporting without spin.British journal of sports medicine · 2022Review
- Shoulder pain phenotyping: A guide for clinicians to determine predominant nociceptive, neuropathic, or nociplastic shoulder pain.Brazilian journal of physical therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA strong recommendation against subacromial decompression surgery was issued in 2019. This leaves nonoperative care as the only treatment option, but recent studies suggest that the dose of strengthening exercise is not sufficient in current nonoperative care. At this point, it is unknown if adding more strengthening to current nonoperative care is of clinical value. PURPOSE: To assess the effectiveness of adding a large dose of shoulder strengthening to current nonoperative care for subacromial impingement compared with usual care alone. STUDY
designRandomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.
methodsIn this double-blinded, pragmatic randomized controlled trial, we randomly allocated 200 consecutive patients referred to orthopaedic shoulder specialist care for long-standing shoulder pain (>3 months), aged 18 to 65 years and diagnosed with subacromial impingement using validated criteria, to the intervention group (IG) or control group (CG). Outcome assessors were blinded, and participants were blinded to the study hypothesis as well as to the treatment method in the other group. The CG received usual nonoperative care; the IG underwent the same plus an add-on intervention designed to at least double the total dose of shoulder strengthening. The primary outcome was the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI; 0-100) at 4-month follow-up, with 10 points defined as the minimal clinically important difference. Secondary outcomes included shoulder strength, range of motion, health-related quality of life, and the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS).
resultsIntention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses showed no significant or clinically relevant between-group differences for any outcome. From baseline to 4-month follow-up, SPADI scores improved in both groups (intention-to-treat analysis; IG, -22.1 points; CG, -22.7 points; between-group mean difference, 0.6 points [95% CI, -5.5 to 6.6]). At 4 months after randomization, only 54% of the IG and 48% of the CG (
conclusionAdding a large dose of shoulder strengthening to current nonoperative care for patients with subacromial impingement did not result in superior shoulder-specific patient-reported outcomes. Moreover, approximately half of all randomized patients did not achieve the PASS after 4 months of nonoperative care, leaving many of these patients with unacceptable symptoms. This study showed that adding more exercise is not a viable solution to this problem. REGISTRATION: NCT02747251 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.