Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34047829›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2021

Evolutionary history of Caulobacter toxin-antitoxin systems.

Bert Ely

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bert ElyDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA. ely@sc.edu.
University of South Carolina · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems have been studied in many bacterial genera, but a clear understanding of the evolutionary trajectory of TA operons has not emerged. To address this issue, I identified 42 distinct TA operons in three genomes that represent the three branches of the Caulobacter phylogenetic tree. The location of each operon was then examined to determine if the operon was present in eight additional Caulobacter genomes. Most of the 42 TA operons were present at the same chromosomal location in genomes that represent at least two different branches of the Caulobacter phylogenetic tree. This result indicates that the chromosomal location of TA operons is conserved over evolutionary time scales. One the other hand, there were 177 instances where a TA operon was not present at an expected chromosomal location and four instances where only the antitoxin gene was present. Thus, the variable number of TA operons found in each genome appears to be due primarily to the loss of TA operons, and the addition of new TA operons to a genome was relatively rare. An additional feature of the TA operons was that they seemed to accumulate mutations faster than the adjacent genes.

Indexed as

Bacterial ToxinsCaulobacterToxin-Antitoxin SystemsBacterial ProteinsOperonPhylogenyBacterial ProteinsBacterial Toxins

Identifiers

PMID34047829
OpenAlexW3164687667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.