ReviewWorld journal of urology2022
Machine learning applications to enhance patient specific care for urologic surgery.
Review in World journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Understanding steinstrasse: a systematic review of definitions, clinical management, and emerging perspectives in endourology.World journal of urology · 2026Pooled it
- Current state of AI for shockwave lithotripsy: a systematic review from YAU and EAU endourology.World journal of urology · 2025Pooled it
- Advancing Genitourinary Cancer Surgery: The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- AI-driven preoperative risk assessment in kidney cancer surgery: A comparative feasibility study of machine learning models.BJUI compass · 2025Article
- Clinical applications of artificial intelligence in robotic urologic surgery.Asian journal of urology · 2025Article
- Global Research Landscape of Artificial Intelligence in Urology: A Systematic Analysis of Emerging Trends, Clinical Impact, and Collaborative Networks (1971-2024).Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2025Article
- Review
- Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy in Urological Malignancies: Current Applications and Future Perspectives.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Clinical Reproducibility of the Stone Volume Measurement: A "Kidney Stone Calculator" Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence for renal cancer: From imaging to histology and beyond.Asian journal of urology · 2022Review
- A warning system for urolithiasis via retrograde intrarenal surgery using machine learning: an experimental study.BMC urology · 2022Article
- Patient specific simulation in urology: where are we now and what does the future look like?World journal of urology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAs computational power has improved over the past 20 years, the daily application of machine learning methods has become more prevalent in daily life. Additionally, there is increasing interest in the clinical application of machine learning techniques. We sought to review the current literature regarding machine learning applications for patient-specific urologic surgical care.
methodsWe performed a broad search of the current literature via the PubMed-Medline and Google Scholar databases up to Dec 2020. The search terms "urologic surgery" as well as "artificial intelligence", "machine learning", "neural network", and "automation" were used.
resultsThe focus of machine learning applications for patient counseling is disease-specific. For stone disease, multiple studies focused on the prediction of stone-free rate based on preoperative characteristics of clinical and imaging data. For kidney cancer, many studies focused on advanced imaging analysis to predict renal mass pathology preoperatively. Machine learning applications in prostate cancer could provide for treatment counseling as well as prediction of disease-specific outcomes. Furthermore, for bladder cancer, the reviewed studies focus on staging via imaging, to better counsel patients towards neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Additionally, there have been many efforts on automatically segmenting and matching preoperative imaging with intraoperative anatomy.
conclusionMachine learning techniques can be implemented to assist patient-centered surgical care and increase patient engagement within their decision-making processes. As data sets improve and expand, especially with the transition to large-scale EHR usage, these tools will improve in efficacy and be utilized more frequently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.