ArticleJAMA network open2021
Assessment of Modifiable Factors for the Association of Marital Status With Cancer-Specific Survival.
Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.
- Two web-based dynamically interactive nomograms and risk stratification systems for predicting survival outcomes and guiding treatment in non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Trial
- Marital status and perceived stress in men with advanced prostate cancer: A randomized-controlled trial of cognitive behavioral stress management.Journal of psychosomatic research · 2023Trial
- Establishment and validation of a prognostic nomogram for patients with early-onset stage I-II colon cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2023Trial
- A Web-Based Prediction Model for Cancer-Specific Survival of Elderly Patients Undergoing Surgery With Prostate Cancer: A Population-Based Study.Frontiers in public health · 2022Trial
- Development and Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram for Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Population-Based Study.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Trial
- Machine learning-based mapping of multimodal treatment allocations and prognostic implications of clinical concordance in non-small cell lung cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Utilizing relative survival to investigate melanoma subtypes across intersectional demographics: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cohort study.Skin health and disease · 2026Article
- Rural-urban disparities in cardiovascular and other competing risk of death among cancer patients.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- Article
- Marital status and post-radical prostatectomy outcomes: results from the SEARCH database.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Exploring the role of marital status on survival and stage at diagnosis in early-onset colorectal cancer by race/ethnicity.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Investigating the association between marital status and survival outcomes in patients with follicular thyroid carcinoma: a population-based analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Sex-Based Disparities in Interval Time to Receipt of Surgical Treatment of Invasive Lung Cancer in Tennessee.Research square · 2026Article
- Personalized prognosis: construction and validation of a survival prediction model for older postoperative differentiated thyroid cancer patients.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Gender differences in the association between marriage and epigenetic age.Frontiers in aging · 2026Article
- Social inequalities in survival among women with breast cancer in southeastern Brazil: a retrospective cohort study.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026Article
- Marital status and competing risks of mortality in non-small cell lung cancer: a SEER-based nomogram analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Impact of marital disparities in treatment and outcome in elderly patients with T1N0M0 small cell lung cancer.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Single status shows age dependent bidirectional effects in differentiated thyroid cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Sex-Based Differences in Outcomes for Glioblastoma Patients Treated with Hypofractionated Chemoradiotherapy.Cancers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Married patients with cancer have better cancer-specific survival than unmarried patients. Increasing the early diagnosis and definitive treatment of cancer among unmarried patients may reduce the survival gap. Objectives: To evaluate the extent to which marriage is associated with cancer-specific survival, stage at diagnosis, and treatment among patients with 9 common solid cancers and to recommend methods for reducing the survival gap. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, population-based cohort study included patients older than 18 years who were diagnosed with 1 of 9 common cancers between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2016. Patient data were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Statistical analyses were performed from August 1 to October 1, 2020. Exposures: Marital status, classified as married and unmarried (including single, separated, divorced, widowed, and unmarried patients or domestic partners). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the time ratio (TR) of cancer-specific survival (married vs unmarried). Mediation analyses were conducted to determine the extent to which the association of marriage with cancer-specific survival was mediated by stage at diagnosis and treatment. Results: This study included 1 733 906 patients (894 379 [51.6%] women; 1 067 726 [61.6%] married; mean [SD] age, 63.76 [12.60] years). Multivariate analyses found that those who were married were associated with better cancer-specific survival than unmarried patients (TR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.35-1.37). Early diagnosis in breast cancer, colorectal cancer, endometrial cancer, and melanoma mediated the association between marital status and cancer-specific survival (breast cancer: proportion mediated [PM], 11.4%; 95% CI, 11.2%-11.6%; colorectal cancer: PM, 10.9%; 95% CI, 10.7%-11.2%; endometrial cancer: PM, 12.9%; 95% CI, 12.5%-13.3%; melanoma: PM, 12.0%; 95% CI, 11.7-12.4%). Surgery mediated the association between marital status and cancer-specific survival in lung (PM, 52.2%; 95% CI, 51.9%-52.4%), pancreatic (PM, 28.9%; 95% CI, 28.6%-29.3%), and prostate (PM, 39.3%; 95% CI, 39.0%-39.6%) cancers. Chemotherapy mediated the association of marital status with cancer-specific survival in lung (PM, 37.7%; 95% CI, 37.6%-37.9%) and pancreatic (PM, 28.6%; 95% CI, 28.4%-28.9%) cancers. Improved cancer-specific survival associated with marriage was greater among men than women (men: TR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.25-1.28; women: TR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.19-1.21). The contribution of receiving an early diagnosis and treatment with surgery or chemotherapy to the association between marital status and cancer-specific survival was greater among men than women (early diagnosis: PM, 21.7% [95% CI, 21.5%-21.9%] vs PM, 20.3% [95% CI, 20.2%-20.4%]; surgery: PM, 26.6% [95% CI, 26.4%-26.7%] vs PM, 11.1% [95% CI, 11.0%-11.2%]; chemotherapy: PM, 6.8% [95% CI, 6.7%-6.8%] vs PM, 5.1% [95% CI, 5.0%-5.2%]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, survival disparities associated with marital status were attributable to early diagnosis in breast, colorectal, and endometrial cancers as well as melanoma and to treatment-related variables in lung, pancreatic, and prostate cancers. The findings also suggest that marriage may play a greater protective role in the cancer-specific survival of men than of women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.