Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34047765›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2021

Evaluation of Seropositivity Following BNT162b2 Messenger RNA Vaccination for SARS-CoV-2 in Patients Undergoing Treatment for Cancer.

Amir Massarweh, Noa Eliakim-Raz, Amos Stemmer, Adva Levy-Barda, Shlomit Yust-Katz, Alona Zer, Alexandra Benouaich-Amiel, Haim Ben-Zvi, Neta Moskovits, Baruch Brenner and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 181 papers, 17 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
181citing papers in PubMed, 17 pooled it
18.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

181 citing papers in PubMed, 17 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 289 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Immunogenicity and Safety of the COVID-19 Vaccines Compared With Control in Healthy Adults: A Qualitative and Systematic Review.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2022
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Immunological and clinical efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in immunocompromised populations: a systematic review.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Article

121 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Amir MassarwehDavidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Noa Eliakim-RazDepartment of Medicine E, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Amos StemmerSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Adva Levy-BardaBiobank, Department of Pathology, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Shlomit Yust-KatzSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Alona ZerDavidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Alexandra Benouaich-AmielDavidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Haim Ben-ZviSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Neta MoskovitsFelsenstein Medical Research Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Baruch BrennerDavidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Jihad BisharaInfectious Diseases Unit, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Dafna YahavInfectious Diseases Unit, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Boaz TadmorResearch Authority, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Tal ZaksModerna, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Salomon M StemmerDavidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Rabin Medical Center · ILTel Aviv University · ILModerna Therapeutics (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Patients with cancer undergoing treatment are at high risk of COVID-19 following SARS-CoV-2 infection; however, their ability to produce an adequate antibody response to messenger RNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is unclear. Objective: To evaluate rates of antispike (anti-S) antibody response to a BNT162b2 vaccine in patients with cancer who are undergoing systemic treatment vs healthy controls. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study included 102 adult patients with solid tumors undergoing active intravenous anticancer treatment and 78 controls who received the second dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine at least 12 days before enrollment. The controls were taken from a convenience sample of the patients' family/caregivers who accompanied them to treatment. The study was conducted between February 22, 2021, and March 15, 2021 at Davidoff Cancer Center at Beilinson Hospital (Petah Tikva, Israel). Interventions: Blood samples were drawn from the study participants. Serum samples were analyzed and the titers of the IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain were determined using a commercially available immunoassay. Seropositivity was defined as 50 or greater AU/mL. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the rate of seropositivity. Secondary outcomes included comparisons of IgG titers and identifying factors that were associated with seropositivity using univariate/multivariable analyses. Results: The analysis included 180 participants, which comprised 102 patients with cancer (median [interquartile range (IQR)] age, 66 [56-72] years; 58 men [57%]) and 78 healthy controls (median [IQR] age, 62 [49-70] years; 25 men [32%]). The most common tumor type was gastrointestinal (29 [28%]). In the patient group, 92 (90%) were seropositive for SARS-CoV 2 antispike IgG antibodies after the second vaccine dose, whereas in the control group, all were seropositive. The median IgG titer in the patients with cancer was significantly lower than that in the controls (1931 [IQR, 509-4386] AU/mL vs 7160 [IQR, 3129-11 241] AU/mL; P < .001). In a multivariable analysis, the only variable that was significantly associated with lower IgG titers was treatment with chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (β, -3.5; 95% CI, -5.6 to -1.5). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with cancer who were receiving active systemic therapy, 90% of patients exhibited adequate antibody response to the BNT162b2 vaccine, although their antibody titers were significantly lower than those of healthy controls. Further research into the clinical relevance of lower titers and their durability is required. Nonetheless, the data support vaccinating patients with cancer as a high priority, even during therapy.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCase-Control StudiesCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineImmunoglobulin GIsraelMaleMiddle AgedmRNA VaccinesNeoplasmsAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin GmRNA VaccinesRNA, MessengerVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID34047765
PMCPMC8164144
OpenAlexW3164768289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.