ArticleClinical and translational medicine2021
Influence of low tumor content on tumor mutational burden estimation by whole-exome sequencing and targeted panel sequencing.
Article in Clinical and translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- GICPIdb: an archival repository of multimodal data focusing on pathological images for gastrointestinal cancers.Frontiers in big data · 2026Article
- The role of neoantigens and tumor mutational burden in cancer immunotherapy: advances, mechanisms, and perspectives.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2025Review
- Reference Materials for Improving Reliability of Multiomics Profiling.Phenomics (Cham, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Review
- Unlocking the Potential of Biomarkers for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy.Cancers · 2023Article
- Genomic and Glycolytic Entropy Are Reliable Radiogenomic Heterogeneity Biomarkers for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- [The companion diagnostics of targeted therapy and immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2022Article
- Glycolysis-Related LINC02432/Hsa-miR-98-5p/HK2 Axis Inhibits Ferroptosis and Predicts Immune Infiltration, Tumor Mutation Burden, and Drug Sensitivity in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Genetic Analysis of Six Transmembrane Protein Family Genes in Parkinson's Disease in a Large Chinese Cohort.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
- Estimating tumor mutational burden across multiple cancer types using whole-exome sequencing.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Review
- Influence of low tumor content on tumor mutational burden estimation by whole-exome sequencing and targeted panel sequencing.Clinical and translational medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTumor mutational burden (TMB) is a promising biomarker for stratifying patient subpopulation who would benefit from immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapies. Although great efforts have been made for standardizing TMB measurement, mutation calling and TMB quantification can be challenging in samples with low tumor content including liquid biopsies. The effect of varying tumor content on TMB estimation by different assay methods has never been systematically investigated.
methodWe established a series of reference standard DNA samples derived from 11 pairs of tumor-normal matched human cell lines across different cancer types. Each tumor cell line was mixed with its matched normal at 0% (control), 1%, 2%, 5%, and 10% mass-to-mass ratio to mimic the clinical samples with low tumor content. TMB of these reference standards was evaluated by both ∼1000× whole-exome sequencing (wesTMB) and targeted panel sequencing (psTMB) at four different vendors. Both regression and classification analyses of TMB were performed for theoretical investigation and clinical practice purposes.
resultsLinear regression model was established that demonstrated in silico psTMB determined by regions of interest (ROI) as a great representative of wesTMB based on TCGA dataset. It was also true in our reference standard samples as the predicted psTMB interval based on the observed wesTMB captured the intended 90% of the in silico psTMB values. Although ∼1000× deep WES was applied, reference standard samples with less than 5% of tumor proportions are below the assay limit of detection (LoD) of wesTMB quantification. However, predicted wesTMB based on observed psTMB accurately classify (>0.97 AUC) for TMB high and low patient stratification even in samples with 2% of tumor content, which is more clinically relevant, as TMB determination should be a qualitative assay for TMB high and low patient classification. One targeted panel sequencing vendor using an optimized blood psTMB pipeline can further classify TMB status accurately (>0.82 AUC) in samples with only 1% of tumor content.
conclusionsWe developed a linear model to establish the quantitative correlation between wesTMB and psTMB. A set of DNA reference standards was produced in aid to standardize TMB measurements in samples with low tumor content across different targeted sequencing panels. This study is a significant contribution aiming to harmonize TMB estimation and extend its future application in clinical samples with low tumor content including liquid biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.