ReviewThe American journal of gastroenterology2021
Tegaserod for Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation in Women Younger Than 65 Years Without Cardiovascular Disease: Pooled Analyses of 4 Controlled Trials.
Review in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Supplementing HIV-ART with cannabinoids increases serotonin, BHB, and Ahr signaling while reducing secondary bile acids and acylcholines.Science advances · 2025Article
- 2025 Seoul Consensus on Clinical Practice Guidelines for Irritable Bowel Syndrome.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2025Review
- [Pharmacologic Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Predominant Constipation].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2025Review
- Primary Pyrrolimines and Pyridinimines.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The gut-brain axis and pain signalling mechanisms in the gastrointestinal tract.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025Review
- A Review of Pharmacologic and Non-Pharmacologic Therapies in the Management of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Current Recommendations and Evidence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Comparisons of different electrical stimulation modalities for treating visceral pain in a rodent model of irritable bowel syndrome.Bioelectronic medicine · 2024Article
- Chronic Visceral Pain: New Peripheral Mechanistic Insights and Resulting Treatments.Gastroenterology · 2024Review
- Management of irritable bowel syndrome: a narrative review.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024Review
- YTHDF1 in Tumor Cell Metabolism: An Updated Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Abdominal Pain in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: An Evidence-Based, Multidisciplinary Review.Crohn's & colitis 360 · 2023Article
- Antibiotics, gut microbiota, and irritable bowel syndrome: What are the relations?World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Review
- Current Treatment Options and Therapeutic Insights for Gastrointestinal Dysmotility and Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTegaserod was the first US Food and Drug Administration-approved drug for irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) in women and was recently reapproved for use. Recognizing that clinical trials were performed almost 20 years ago, we performed an integrated analysis on patient-reported outcomes relevant to current practice including previously unpublished data.
methodsData from 4 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trials evaluating tegaserod 6 mg b.i.d. in patients with IBS-C were pooled. We analyzed 2 groups: all women (overall population) and women younger than 65 years without a history of cardiovascular ischemic events (indicated population). The primary end point was subjective global assessment of IBS-C symptom relief. Responders rated themselves as "considerably" or "completely" relieved ≥50% of the time or at least "somewhat relieved" 100% of the time over the last 4 weeks.
resultsThe overall and indicated populations included 2,939 (tegaserod [n = 1,478]; placebo [n = 1,461]) and 2,752 (tegaserod [n = 1,386]; placebo [n = 1,366]) participants, respectively. The pooled odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for clinical response during the last 4 weeks in the overall and indicated populations with tegaserod were 1.37 (1.18, 1.59; P < 0.001) and 1.38 (1.18, 1.61; P < 0.001). In the overall and indicated populations, clinical response rates for tegaserod during the last 4 weeks were 43.3% and 44.1% versus 35.9% and 36.5% with placebo (P < 0.001). Adverse events were similar between groups. No significant cardiovascular events related to tegaserod were observed in patients with ≤1 cardiac risk factor. DISCUSSION: Tegaserod 6 mg b.i.d. reduced IBS-C symptoms in overall and US Food and Drug Administration-indicated populations (women aged <65 years with no history of cardiovascular ischemic events).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.