ArticleEuropean endodontic journal2021
Dentinal Tubule Penetration and Adaptation of Bio-C Sealer and AH-Plus: A Comparative SEM Evaluation.
Article in European endodontic journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Article
- Influence of intracanal moisture on dentinal tubule infiltration of a calcium silicate-containing resin-based sealer assessed with confocal laser scanning microscopy.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Assessing Sealing Ability of C-Root SP Strontium Silicate Sealer With Different Obturation Techniques: An in vitro Study.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Dentinal tubule penetration of a bioceramic sealer after different final irrigants: SEM and CLSM study.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Article
- Osteogenic Potential of Various Premixed Hydraulic Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers on Human Bone Marrow Stem Cells.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Removal efficacy of two different root canal sealers in retrograde cavities: a micro-CT study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Does radiotherapy compromise root canal sealer penetration? An in vitro confocal laser microscopy study.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the tubular penetration of two different types of nanoparticle root canal sealers over apically separated files: a scanning electron microscopic study (in vitro study).BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Article
- Endodontic Treatment of an Upper Lateral Incisor with Oehlers' Type II Dens Invaginatus: A Case Report.Iranian endodontic journal · 2025Article
- Dentinal tubular penetration ability of epoxy resin-based and bioceramic-based root canal sealers.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Comparative Micro-CT Evaluation of Dentinal Tubule Penetration of BIO-C and AH Plus Jet Root Canal Sealer Using Three Intra-Canal Activation Techniques.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024Article
- In Vitro Microscopical and Microbiological Assessment of the Sealing Ability of Calcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealers.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Article
- Article
- Evaluation of cytotoxicity and adaptability of a novel bioceramic root canal sealer: AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2024Article
- A novel simplified approach for endodontic retrograde surgery in short single-rooted teeth.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Article
- The Contribution of Various In Vitro Methodologies to Comprehending the Filling Ability of Root Canal Pastes in Primary Teeth.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the dentinal tubule penetration and adaptation of a premixed bioceramic sealer and an epoxy-resin based sealer in the three radicular thirds.
methods30 wide roots, with single straight canals and totally formed apexes, were endodontically prepared and divided into two groups (n=14) according to the sealer used for root canal filling: AH-Plus (AHP) and Bio-C Sealer (BIOC). Two samples were left as controls. After the canals were filled, the samples were cut and viewed under Scanning Electron Microscopy by taking images to analyse the tubular penetration and adaptation of the sealers. The results were statistically analysed with the Shapiro Wilk, Levene and Mann-Whitney tests (P<0.05).
resultsBIOC showed significantly higher penetration in dentinal tubules than AHP in the cervical, middle and apical thirds of the root canal (P<0.05) and better adaptation to the dentinal tubule walls.
conclusionUnder the parameters of this study, BIOC exhibits higher penetration and better adaptation to the dentinal tubules compared to AHP.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.