ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2021
Predictive Models to Identify Small Molecule Activators and Inhibitors of Opioid Receptors.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- µORScreen: a lightweight consensus modeling framework for µ-opioid receptor ligand prediction and virtual screening.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Analyzing the Chemical Space of Opioid Receptor Agonists and Antagonists: Insights from Computational Models.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Machine learning-enhanced QSAR modeling for predicting drug efficacy against the RET V804M kinase domain mutation.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- μOR-ligand: target-aware view-based hybrid feature selection for μ-opioid receptor ligand functional classification.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2025Article
- Ligand-Induced Biased Activation of GPCRs: Recent Advances and New Directions from In Silico Approaches.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- RNA Modifications as Drug Targets: Unlocking the Therapeutic Potential of the Epitranscriptome.Current genomics · 2025Review
- Leveraging Artificial Intelligence in GPCR Activation Studies: Computational Prediction Methods as Key Drivers of Knowledge.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Developing predictive models for µ opioid receptor binding using machine learning and deep learning techniques.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Unlocking the potential of AI: Machine learning and deep learning models for predicting carcinogenicity of chemicals.Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Toxicology and carcinogenesis · 2025Review
- Machine Learned Classification of Ligand Intrinsic Activities at Human μ-Opioid Receptor.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2024Article
- Machine Learned Classification of Ligand Intrinsic Activities at HumanbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Multiobjective Molecular Optimization for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Using Generative Network Complex.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2023Article
- Machine-learning repurposing of DrugBank compounds for opioid use disorder.Computers in biology and medicine · 2023Article
- Advancing translational science education.Clinical and translational science · 2022Review
- DeepREAL: a deep learning powered multi-scale modeling framework for predicting out-of-distribution ligand-induced GPCR activity.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Teaching principles of translational science to a broad scientific audience using a case study approach: A pilot course from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Opioid receptors (OPRs) are the main targets for the treatment of pain and related disorders. The opiate compounds that activate these receptors are effective analgesics but their use leads to adverse effects, and they often are highly addictive drugs of abuse. There is an urgent need for alternative chemicals that are analgesics and to reduce/avoid the unwanted effects in order to relieve the public health crisis of opioid addiction. Here, we aim to develop computational models to predict the OPR activity of small molecule compounds based on chemical structures and apply these models to identify novel OPR active compounds. We used four different machine learning algorithms to build models based on quantitative high throughput screening (qHTS) data sets of three OPRs in both agonist and antagonist modes. The best performing models were applied to virtually screen a large collection of compounds. The model predicted active compounds were experimentally validated using the same qHTS assays that generated the training data. Random forest was the best classifier with the highest performance metrics, and the mu OPR (OPRM)-agonist model achieved the best performance measured by AUC-ROC (0.88) and MCC (0.7) values. The model predicted actives resulted in hit rates ranging from 2.3% (delta OPR-agonist) to 15.8% (OPRM-agonist) after experimental confirmation. Compared to the original assay hit rate, all models enriched the hit rate by ≥2-fold. Our approach produced robust OPR prediction models that can be applied to prioritize compounds from large libraries for further experimental validation. The models identified several novel potent compounds as activators/inhibitors of OPRs that were confirmed experimentally. The potent hits were further investigated using molecular docking to find the interactions of the novel ligands in the active site of the corresponding OPR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.