ArticleClinical implant dentistry and related research2021
Osseodensification effect on implants primary and secondary stability: Multicenter controlled clinical trial.
Article in Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07627633 (Efficacy of Adjunctive Theravex Tissue Care® With Xenograft Using Osseodensification in Internal Sinus Lifting), which is not on this map. Cited by 62 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy of Adjunctive Theravex Tissue Care® With Xenograft Using Osseodensification in Internal Sinus Lifting: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Resonance Frequency Analysis and Clinical Outcomes in Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical implant dentistry and related research · 2026Pooled it
- Primary and secondary stability in implants placed in low-density bone using conventional vs. osseodensification technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2025Pooled it
- Effectiveness of bone expansion, compacting and densification in narrow alveolar crests: a systematic review and a meta-analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative evaluation of osseodensification drilling versus conventional drilling technique on dental implant stability: A systematic review.Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society · 2024Pooled it
- Accuracy, Efficiency, and Patient- and Surgeon-Reported Outcomes of Static Versus Robotic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Clinical oral implants research · 2026Trial
- Implant stability following septal expansion in immediate mandibular molars: a pilot randomized clinical trial comparing piezoelectric surgery and osseodensification.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Clinical evaluation of cold plasma surface activation using different plasma systems on early implant stability: a randomized controlled within-patient trial.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Implant stability in the posterior maxilla: clinical and radiographic comparison of osseodensification and conventional drilling: a randomized clinical trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Trial
- Osseodensification by Densah burs in combination with activated plasma albumin gel for transcrestal maxillary sinus lifting with simultaneous implant placement.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2025Trial
- Evaluation of the stability of implants placed in low-quality bone following the use of osseodensification technique versus ridge expanders:randomized clinical trial.BMC oral health · 2025Trial
- The Effect of Osseodensification on Implant Stability and Marginal Bone Levels: A Randomized Control Clinical Trial.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2025Trial
- Osseodensification versus piezoelectric internal sinus elevation (PISE) technique in delayed implant placement (a randomized controlled clinical trial).BMC oral health · 2024Trial
- Analysis of osseointegration of implants with macrogeometries with healing chambers: a randomized clinical trial.BMC oral health · 2024Trial
- Influence of different surgical techniques on primary implant stability in the posterior maxilla: a randomized controlled clinical trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Trial
- Changes in implant stability using different site preparation techniques: Osseodensification drills versus piezoelectric surgery. A multi-center prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.Clinical implant dentistry and related research · 2023Trial
- Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Insertion Torque and Implant Stability of Two Different Implant Macrogeometries in the Initial Periods of Osseointegration.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Trial
- Primary stability of dental implants placed in low-density polyurethane blocks: Undersized osteotomy versus osseodensification, an in vitro comparative study.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2026Article
- Hybrid Funnel Technique Reduces Marginal Bone Loss Versus Conventional Drilling: A 3-Year, Prospective, Non-randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial.Clinical implant dentistry and related research · 2026Article
- Lateral Wall Failure During Implant Osteotomy Preparation in a Standardized Narrow-Ridge Model: Osseodensification Versus Conventional Drilling-An Ex Vivo Controlled Study.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Article
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOsseodensification (OD) has shown to improve implant stability; however, the influences of implant design, dimensions, and surgical site characteristics are unknown. PURPOSE: To compare the insertion torque (IT) and temporal implant stability quotients (ISQ) of implants placed via OD or subtractive drilling (SD). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis multicenter controlled clinical trial enrolled 56 patients, whom were in need of at least 2 implants (n = 150 implants). Patients were treated with narrow, regular, or wide implants and short, regular, or long implants in the anterior or posterior region of the maxilla or in the posterior region of the mandible. Osteotomies were performed following manufacturers recommendation. IT was recorded with a torque indicator. ISQ was recorded with resonance frequency analysis immediately after surgery, 3 and 6 weeks.
resultsData complied as a function of osteotomy indicated significantly higher IT for OD relative to SD. OD outperformed conventional SD for all pairwise comparisons of arches (maxilla and mandible) and areas operated (anterior and posterior), diameters and lengths of the implants, except for short implants. Overall, ISQ data also demonstrated significantly higher values for OD compared to SD regardless of the healing period. Relative to immediate readings, ISQ values significantly decreased at 3 weeks, returning to immediate levels at 6 weeks; however, ISQ values strictly remained above 68 throughout healing time for OD. Data as a function of arch operated and osteotomy, area operated and osteotomy, implant dimensions and osteotomy, also exhibited higher ISQ values for OD relative to SD on pairwise comparisons, except for short implants.
conclusionsOD demonstrated higher IT and temporal ISQ values relative to SD, irrespective of arch and area operated as well as implant design and dimension, with an exception for short implants. Future studies should focus on biomechanical parameters and bone level change evaluation after loading.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.