Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34046818›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2022

An Online Survey and Focus Groups for Promoting Cancer Prevention Measures.

Sumit K Shah, Maggie Jones-Carr, Milan Bimali, L Joseph Su, Mayumi Nakagawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sumit K ShahDepartments of Pathology and Biostatistics, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham St. Slot 502, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2916-8045
Maggie Jones-CarrDepartments of Pathology and Biostatistics, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham St. Slot 502, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA.
Milan BimaliDepartments of Pathology and Biostatistics, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham St. Slot 502, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4446-3977
L Joseph SuDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Mayumi NakagawaDepartments of Pathology and Biostatistics, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham St. Slot 502, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA. mnakagawa@uams.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0377-4613

Funding

Expanding Translational Research in ArkansasUL1TR003107 · NCATS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI JAMES, LAURA P · 2019 to 2023
$21.6M
Understanding and Enhancing T-Cell Responses to High Risk Human Papillomaviruses-RenewalR01CA143130 · NCI · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI NAKAGAWA, MAYUMI · 2010 to 2025
$10.0M
Expanding Translational Research in ArkansasU54TR001629 · NCATS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI JAMES, LAURA P · 2017 to 2017
$3.5M
NCATS NIH HHS U54 TR001629NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003107NCI NIH HHS R01 CA143130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to design a cancer prevention promotion program in the region, suggestions were solicited at a medical center. We hypothesized that a majority would be native to state, and would be able to articulate about the barriers that may exist. Through online survey and focus groups, suggestions were sought, and the knowledge and the compliance with cancer prevention recommendations were assessed to determine the participants' qualifications as potential educators. Sixty-five point two percent of participants (n = 1018) graduated from high school in Arkansas. The most commonly given suggestions were to provide education to increase awareness, to use social media for promotion, to improve access, and to reduce costs. Self-reported adherence rates to breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening were 82.6% (n = 954), 75.8% (n = 541), and 76.7% (n = 453), respectively. Having a personal history of cancer significantly increased colorectal cancer screening uptake (p = 0.04), but paradoxically decreased mammography uptake (p = 0.007). Salary of $40,000 and more and having a Bachelor's degree or higher were associated with higher compliance of Papanicolaou test only (p = 0.007 and p = 0.001, respectively). A majority (67.7%, n = 1056) of respondents expressed willingness to contribute to promoting cancer prevention measures, and 38.3% (n = 559) were willing to participate in focus groups. However, only 6.3% (n = 35) actually participated. The participants' knowledge and compliance appeared to be sufficient, but their follow through in focus group participation was poor.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMammographyMass ScreeningPapanicolaou TestSurveys and QuestionnairesVaginal SmearsBreast cancerCancer preventionCervical cancerColorectal cancerEarly detection

Identifiers

PMID34046818
PMCPMC8626524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.