ReviewDer Nervenarzt2021
[Community mental health approaches for avoidance of patient placement in closed psychiatric facilities-a positioning].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- [The importance of integration support in the care of severely mentally ill people].Der Nervenarzt · 2025Review
- [Services for persons with mental illness in Germany from the perspective of the health and social system: current needs for development].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2023Review
- [Closed facilities for people with intellectual or mental disabilities-Characteristics of residents based on file analyses].Der Nervenarzt · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn many cases the placement of people with mental disorders in closed residential homes is an expression of the lack of alternative care options. In the area of tension between the need for security in the case of chronically self-endangering behavior, recurrent acute psychiatric crisis interventions and a lack of perspective to establish a permanent therapy, in many places a placement in a closed facility approved under care law is carried out.
objectiveWhat alternatives are there to closed institutional care in the psychiatric care system in Germany?
methodsA trialogical discussion process was carried out in an expert panel taking the relevant literature into consideration and with the participation of organizations of those affected and their relatives.
resultsThe community psychiatric care system in Germany is extremely heterogeneous. The fragmented sociolegal and financing systems makes cross-sectoral and continuous care planning and service provision difficult. Precisely tailored and individualized services that could prevent the persons concerned from being placed in a closed home exist in Germany only at a few locations and in the form of individual model projects.
conclusionThe structural and sociolegal deficits addressed require a reform of the institutional framework and a redirection of all actors involved, including the clinics. Alternative approaches to the care of people with severe mental disorders are outlined. These include the Wedding model, binding community psychiatric structures, the basic functional model and assistance services under the German Social Code IX following the revision of the Federal Participation Act.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.