ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Improving Care for Childhood Obesity: A Quality Improvement Initiative.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current state of electronic problems lists in primary care: a rapid scoping review.Family practice · 2026Article
- Integrating plan-do-check-act (pdca)-based closed-loop management into lifestyle intervention for pediatric primary obesity.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Leveraging clinical decision support system tools for childhood overweight/obesity management.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Will a Programmatic Framework Integrating Food Is Medicine Achieve Value on Investment?Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Aligning with Obesity Guidelines: A Quality Improvement Initiative in Pediatric Primary Care.Journal of pediatrics. Clinical practice · 2024Article
- Barriers to Care for Pediatric Patients with Obesity.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Impact of a Clinical Decision Support Alert on Informed Consent Documentation in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
- Enhancing Pediatric Obesity Management through Quality Improvement: A Hybrid Approach to Intensive Health Behavior and Lifestyle Treatment in Primary Care.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
- Increasing Screening Rates for Comorbidities in Adolescents with Elevated Body Mass Index in Pediatric Primary Care.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
- Identifying Children in Foster Care and Improving Foster Care Documentation in Primary Care.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
- Telemedicine Quality Improvement during the Corona Virus 2019 Pandemic Increases Pediatric Weight Management Access.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obesity affected 13.7 million children in the United States in 2015. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) offers an evidence-based approach to obesity management, but adherence to recommendations is suboptimal. Our objective was to improve provider adherence to the AAP recommendations for care of patients with obesity by making systematic changes in our practice for patients of ages > 2 and younger than 19 years with a BMI
methodsWe performed a retrospective chart review of 417 qualifying encounters to assess adherence in the six months preceding the initiative. We measured adherence as a proportion of eligible patients who had (1) obesity on the problem list; (2) laboratory work offered; (3) counseling provided; (4) early follow-up recommended; (5) referral to a weight management program. In 2018, a multidisciplinary QI team conducted plan-do-study-act cycles to educate providers on the AAP recommendations and improve obesity-related care systems. The initiative lasted 18 months.
resultsDuring the initiative, we tracked 885 patient encounters via chart review. We witnessed continued improvement in 4 out of 5 measures. For early follow-up offered, we saw improvement after PDSA 1, followed by a decline after PDSA 3. Providers ordered laboratory tests in only 13% of encounters for eligible children ages younger than 6 years versus 45% for ages older than 6 years, an age-dependent disparity that persisted despite the QI initiative.
conclusionOur pediatric practice sustained improvement in adherence to AAP recommendations. There is a need to assess the reasons behind the care disparity based on patient ages.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.