ArticleCureus2021
Gender Disparity in Grants and Awards at the National Institute of Health.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- How the 2025 NIH grant terminations varied by researchers' demographic groups.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Gender Differences in National Institutes of Health Funding for Family Medicine Faculty.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- The Top 100 Cited Articles in Otology and Neurotology and Analysis of Female Authorship.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2025Article
- Barriers and Constraints in Scientific Manuscript Preparation Among Nephrologists: Insights From India.International journal of nephrology · 2025Article
- Challenges and opportunities for growing and retaining a pain research workforce.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Innovations to address gender disparities and support the development of emergency medicine researchers.AEM education and training · 2024Article
- Systematic Review of Women Leading and Participating in Nephrology Randomized Clinical Trials.Kidney international reports · 2024Article
- The Impact of Faculty Gender on Resident Evaluations of Faculty Performance in Emergency Medicine.Cureus · 2024Article
- Article
- Analysis of NIH K99/R00 Awards and the Career Progression of Awardees.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Accomplished women leaders in informatics: insights about successful careers.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Article
- Gender and geographical inequalities among highly cited researchers: a cross-sectional study (2014-2021).Internal and emergency medicine · 2023Article
- Scoping review of sexual and reproductive healthcare for men in the MENA (Middle East and North Africa) region: a handful of paradoxes?BMC public health · 2023Article
- How well does NamSor perform in predicting the country of origin and ethnicity of individuals based on their first and last names?PloS one · 2023Article
- Picture a data scientist: a call to action for increasing diversity, equity, and inclusion in the age of AI.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
- Twenty-Year Trends of Female First Authorship in a Selection of Primary Healthcare Journals.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- Gender and research productivity of award recipients among Canadian national ophthalmology and affiliate subspecialty societies.Women's health (London, England)Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective The National Institute of Health (NIH) supports the academic career of scientists across the United States (U.S.). It promotes and sponsors scientists in conducting wide-ranging clinical and basic science research. Depending on the duration, research type, and budget, there are various types of grants awarded by NIH. Despite considerable advancement in biomedical sciences, female researchers remain underrepresented in obtaining NIH funding. Through this study, we aim to highlight the gender trends in NIH funding and grants. By doing this, we aim to facilitate effective future policymaking to help achieve gender parity in NIH grants and awards. Methods The data were obtained from the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tool (RePORT). The extracted data by gender were tabulated showing percentages of females as Research Grant Investigators, Research Career Development Award Recipients and Kirschstein-National Research Service Award (NRSA) Trainees and Fellows, recipients of Research Grants, Research Project Grants (RPGs), and R01 equivalent grants including types 1 or 2, over two decades (1999-2019). Absolute percentage change was also calculated and included in the tables. Results The percentage of females as NIH Research Grant Investigators has increased at centers, research centers as well as for RPGs and Small Business Innovation Research and Small Business Technology Transfer (SBIR/STTR) programs. For Research Career Development Award Recipients and Kirschstein-NRSA Trainees and Fellows, the proportion of female pre-doctoral institutional trainees, post-doctoral fellows, post-doctoral institutional trainees, mentored research career awardees, and other research career awardees have steadily increased. However, there was a decrease in the percentage of female pre-doctoral fellow awardees. The percentage of females receiving all RPGs, R01-New (type 1) and R01-Renewal (type 2) grants has also decreased. Conclusion Despite an overall increase in the percentage of female researchers successfully receiving NIH grants and awards, they continue to lag compared to their male counterparts. With the increasing number of female doctoral graduates, it is imperative to address this disparity in NIH funding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.