Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34046273›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

Genetic Variation and the Role of Multigene Panel Testing for Hereditary Breast Cancer: A Single-Institution Experience.

Kit Lu, Meagan Smith, Tejaswi Kanderi, Julia Verbiar, Jennifer Laspe, Latesha Bair, Lisa Torp

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kit LuMedical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Hillman Cancer Center, Harrisburg, USA.
Meagan SmithGenetics, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Hillman Cancer Center, Harrisburg, USA.
Tejaswi KanderiInternal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Harrisburg, Harrisburg, USA.
Julia VerbiarGenetics, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Hillman Cancer Center, Harrisburg, USA.
Jennifer LaspeMedicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Hillman Cancer Center, Harrisburg, USA.
Latesha BairMedicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Hillman Cancer Center, Harrisburg, USA.
Lisa TorpBreast Care Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Hillman Cancer Center, Harrisburg, USA.
Breast Cancer Care · GBCancer Genetics (United States) · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USHarrisburg University of Science and Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in women. There are multiple pathogenic mutations in addition to BRCA1/2 that are implicated in causing hereditary breast cancer. Methods and results We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1568 patients with breast cancer diagnosed between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2018. The age range is 23-87. Among the study population, 26% had genetic testing and 8% of those were found to carry a pathogenic variant, as designated in NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network) Guidelines. Of that 8%, 3.4% were BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, and the rest were other prevalent pathogenic variants. Discussion Expanded panel testing has the potential to increase the detection rate of pathogenic variants compared to testing for BRCA1/2 alone. Diagnostic accuracy of genetic causes of breast cancer has a significant clinical impact on patients and their families in terms of targeted treatment and prevention strategies. There is a strong need for further understanding of genetic patterns and variations in hereditary breast cancer. Awareness of the possibility of moderate to low penetrance genes and variants of uncertain significance (VUS) is important to assist with appropriate genetic counseling. We believe that physicians should consider re-testing with an expanded panel if patients previously had BRCA1 and BRCA2 testings only with a negative result as it may identify additional mutations.

Indexed as

breast cancerextended panelgenetic variationretrospective study

Identifiers

PMID34046273
PMCPMC8140759
OpenAlexW3156956055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.