Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34046209›Full record

ArticleFuture science OA2021

Compound dataset and custom code for deep generative multi-target compound design.

Thomas Blaschke, Jürgen Bajorath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Future science OA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thomas BlaschkeDepartment of Life Science Informatics & Data Science, B-IT, LIMES Program Unit Chemical Biology & Medicinal Chemistry, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Friedrich-Hirzebruch-Allee 6, Bonn, D-53113, Germany.
Jürgen BajorathDepartment of Life Science Informatics & Data Science, B-IT, LIMES Program Unit Chemical Biology & Medicinal Chemistry, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Friedrich-Hirzebruch-Allee 6, Bonn, D-53113, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0557-5714

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimGenerating a data and software infrastructure for evaluating multi-target compound (MT-CPD) design via deep generative modeling. METHODOLOGY: The REINVENT 2.0 approach for generative modeling was extended for MT-CPD design and a large benchmark data set was curated. EXEMPLARY RESULTS & DATA: Proof-of-concept for deep generative MT-CPD design was established. Custom code and the benchmark set comprising 2809 MT-CPDs, 61,928 single-target and 295,395 inactive compounds from biological screens are made freely available. LIMITATIONS & NEXT STEPS: MT-CPD design via deep learning is still at its conceptual stages. It will be required to demonstrate experimental impact. The data and software we provide enable further investigation of MT-CPD design and generation of candidate molecules for experimental programs.

Indexed as

biological assayscomputer-aided drug designgenerative modelinglarge-scale data analysismachine learningmulti-target compounds

Identifiers

PMID34046209
PMCPMC8147756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.