Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34046129›Full record

ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2021

Recognition and reporting of neglected tropical diseases by primary health care workers in Ibadan, Nigeria.

Daniel Chukwuyere Emeto, Adetokunbo Taophic Salawu, Mobolaji Modinat Salawu, Olufunmilayo Ibitola Fawole

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The parasitology of female genital schistosomiasis.Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel Chukwuyere EmetoDepartment of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Adetokunbo Taophic SalawuDepartment of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Mobolaji Modinat SalawuDepartment of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Olufunmilayo Ibitola FawoleDepartment of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
University of Ibadan · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionneglected tropical diseases (NTDs) are serious public health problem worldwide. Primary healthcare (PHC) workers are important in the prevention and control of these diseases. Accurate diagnosis and timely reporting are essential for effective public health response. The study assessed the knowledge of PHC workers on NTDs and identified factors influencing its recognition and reporting.

methodsthe study was a hospital based cross-sectional survey. A multistage sampling technique was used to select 327 healthcare workers from sixty-six PHC facilities in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. A semi-structured, self-administered questionnaire was used to elicit information on respondent´s socio-demographic characteristics, knowledge, recognition and reporting of NTDs. Data analysis were done using independent sample t-test, analysis of variance and logistic regression with p-value set at 0.05.

resultsone hundred and eighty seven (57.2%) respondents had good knowledge of NTDs. The NTDs most known were; Schistosomiasis (78%), Rabies (64.5%), and Onchocerciasis (57.2%). Urban healthcare workers had higher knowledge score on NTDs (p= 0.018). Young age (AOR= 3.40, CI= 1.20 -9.63), length of practice (AOR=4.65, CI= 1.20-18.09) and previous training on NTDs (AOR = 7.09, CI= 3.15 - 15.93) significantly predicted NTDs recognition, while availability of reporting forms (AOR= 3.17, CI=1.07 - 9.35), training on disease reporting (AOR= 3.41, CI= 11.17 - 9.92) and feedback on previous diseases reported (AOR= 4.12, CI= 1.32-12.80) were significant predictors of reporting NTDs.

conclusionthe healthcare workers knowledge on NTDs was inadequate. Periodic training and continued education on NTDs are recommended. PHC workers also require supportive supervision.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePrimary Health CareAdultAge FactorsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeglected DiseasesNigeriaSurveys and QuestionnairesTropical MedicineYoung AdultknowledgeNeglected tropical diseasesonchocerciasisprimary healthcare workersrecognitionreportingschistosomiasis

Identifiers

PMID34046129
PMCPMC8140673
OpenAlexW3165539137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.