Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34046088›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2021

Erdafitinib treatment in Brazilian patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): real-world evidence from an Expanded Access Program.

Fernando Sabino M Monteiro, Adriano Gonçalves E Silva, Andrea Juliana P de S Gomes, Carolina Dutra, Naira Oliveira Ferreira, Rodrigo Coutinho Mariano, Fabio A Schutz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Disease markers · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Fernando Sabino M MonteiroOncology and Hematology Department, Hospital Santa Lucia, SHLS 716 Cj. C, Brasília, DF 70390-700, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6621-8251
Adriano Gonçalves E SilvaLatin American Cooperative Oncology Group - LACOG, Genito-Urinary Tumors Section, Porto Alegre, RS, 90619-900, Brazil.
Andrea Juliana P de S GomesLiga Norte Riograndense Contra o Câncer, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Carolina DutraYNOVA Pesquisa Clínica, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Naira Oliveira FerreiraHospital Universitário de Brasília - Universidade de Brasília - UNB, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Rodrigo Coutinho MarianoHospital Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Fabio A SchutzLatin American Cooperative Oncology Group - LACOG, Genito-Urinary Tumors Section, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Universidade de Brasília · BRBeneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo · BREastern Cooperative Oncology Group · USHospital Nossa Senhora das Graças · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundErdafitinib is the first targeted therapy approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Approval was based on a phase II single-arm trial that demonstrated significant activity of erdafitinib in patients with tumors harboring FGFR2/3 alterations. In Brazil, an Expanded Access Program (EAP) provided patients with early access to erdafitinib prior to market authorization. The current report describes characteristics and outcomes of patients with mUC on erdafitinib therapy.

methodsPatients with mUC that failed first- and second-line systemic therapies were screened for FGFR2/3 alterations in primary or metastatic tumor tissues. Patients with FGFR2/3 alterations were selected to receive erdafitinib at the standard dosing schedule and were followed prospectively to evaluate the efficacy and safety outcomes.

resultsFrom 19 April 2019, through 13 March 2020, 47 patients with mUC from 10 Brazilian centers were tested for FGFR2/3 alterations. Alterations in FGFR2/3 were found in 12 patients (25.5%) and all of them were eligible for the EAP. Four patients (33%) had partial response, while two patients (17%) had stable disease. Progressive disease, the best response, was observed in five patients (42%). At a median follow-up of 16.2 months, the median time to treatment failure (TTF) was 2.8 months. When considering only patients with objective response, the median TTF was 5.3 months. Adverse events (AEs) were reported for any grade and grade 3 or higher in 10 patients (83%) and 5 patients (42%), respectively. The most common AE was hyperphosphatemia.

conclusionThis first real-world evidence report of heavily treated patients with mUC confirms the efficacy and safety of erdafitinib in a disease setting with a lack of treatment options.

Indexed as

advanced diseaseerdafitinibreal-world evidencetargeted therapyurothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID34046088
PMCPMC8135201
OpenAlexW3160588632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.