Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34046033›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2021

Infection and Immune Memory: Variables in Robust Protection by Vaccines Against SARS-CoV-2.

Pankaj Ahluwalia, Kumar Vaibhav, Meenakshi Ahluwalia, Ashis K Mondal, Nikhil Sahajpal, Amyn M Rojiani, Ravindra Kolhe

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. COVID-19 vaccine development: milestones, lessons and prospects.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pankaj AhluwaliaDepartment of Pathology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States.
Kumar VaibhavDepartment of Neurosurgery, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States.
Meenakshi AhluwaliaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States.
Ashis K MondalDepartment of Pathology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States.
Nikhil SahajpalDepartment of Pathology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States.
Amyn M RojianiDepartment of Pathology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States.
Ravindra KolheDepartment of Pathology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States.
Augusta University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 is the cause of a recent pandemic that has led to more than 3 million deaths worldwide. Most individuals are asymptomatic or display mild symptoms, which raises an inherent question as to how does the immune response differs from patients manifesting severe disease? During the initial phase of infection, dysregulated effector immune cells such as neutrophils, macrophages, monocytes, megakaryocytes, basophils, eosinophils, erythroid progenitor cells, and Th17 cells can alter the trajectory of an infected patient to severe disease. On the other hand, properly functioning CD4+, CD8+ cells, NK cells, and DCs reduce the disease severity. Detailed understanding of the immune response of convalescent individuals transitioning from the effector phase to the immunogenic memory phase can provide vital clues to understanding essential variables to assess vaccine-induced protection. Although neutralizing antibodies can wane over time, long-lasting B and T memory cells can persist in recovered individuals. The natural immunological memory captures the diverse repertoire of SARS-CoV-2 epitopes after natural infection whereas, currently approved vaccines are based on a single epitope, spike protein. It is essential to understand the nature of the immune response to natural infection to better identify 'correlates of protection' against this disease. This article discusses recent findings regarding immune response against natural infection to SARS-CoV-2 and the nature of immunogenic memory. More precise knowledge of the acute phase of immune response and its transition to immunological memory will contribute to the future design of vaccines and the identification of variables essential to maintain immune protection across diverse populations.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesDisease ResistanceEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHumansImmunity, CellularImmunologic MemorySARS-CoV-2Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesEpitopes, T-LymphocyteImmune memoryImmune systemImmunological memoryPathogenSARS–CoV-2T cellsVaccineVaccine design

Identifiers

PMID34046033
PMCPMC8144450
OpenAlexW3162213566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.