Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34046010›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2021

Effect of Day 3 and Day 5/6 Embryo Quality on the Reproductive Outcomes in the Single Vitrified Embryo Transfer Cycles.

Ningling Wang, Xinxi Zhao, Meng Ma, Qianqian Zhu, Yao Wang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Incidence of complications amongJournal of medicine and life · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ningling WangDepartment of Assisted Reproduction, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, JiaoTong University, Shanghai, China.
Xinxi ZhaoDepartment of Assisted Reproduction, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, JiaoTong University, Shanghai, China.
Meng MaDepartment of Assisted Reproduction, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, JiaoTong University, Shanghai, China.
Qianqian ZhuDepartment of Assisted Reproduction, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, JiaoTong University, Shanghai, China.
Yao WangDepartment of Assisted Reproduction, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, JiaoTong University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To explore the live birth rate and neonatal outcome after single vitrified blastocyst transfer versus single vitrified cleavage-stage embryo transfer at different grades of embryo quality. Methods: A retrospective cohort study including 6077 single vitrified-thawed embryo transfer cycles was performed in the time-period from January 2013 to December 2018. Results: After controlling for potential confounding variables, there are 161% increased odds of a live birth after transfer of single good quality embryo at day 5, 152% increased odds of a live birth after transfer of single poor quality embryo at day 5, 60% increased odds of a live birth after transfer of single good quality embryo at day 6 compared with transfer of single good quality embryo at day 3. Results from the generalized estimated equation regression showed significant relationship of unadjusted birth weight with development stage of embryo and embryo quality (good quality embryo on day 5 vs. Good quality embryo on day 3:β=108.55, SE=34.89, P=0.002; good quality embryo on day 6 vs. Good quality embryo on day 3:β=68.80, SE=33.75, P=0.041). However, no significant differences were seen in birth weight between transfer single poor quality embryo on day 5, 6 and transfer single good quality embryo on day 3. Conclusion: A significant increase in live birth rate and birth weight after transfer of single good quality embryo on day 5 and day 6 compared with transfer of single good quality embryo on day 3 in the vitrified embryo transfer cycles.

Indexed as

VitrificationAdultBirth RateBlastocystCryopreservationEmbryo Culture TechniquesEmbryo TransferFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansLive BirthPregnancyPregnancy RateRetrospective StudiesSingle Embryo TransferSperm Injections, Intracytoplasmicbirth weightblastocyst transferembryo qualitylive birthvitrification

Identifiers

PMID34046010
PMCPMC8147686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.