Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34045769›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers2020

Comparison of Breast MRI Tumor Classification Using Human-Engineered Radiomics, Transfer Learning From Deep Convolutional Neural Networks, and Fusion Methods.

Heather M Whitney, Hui Li, Yu Ji, Peifang Liu, Maryellen L Giger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis using deep learning-based features.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Heather M WhitneyDepartment of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA, and also with the Department of Physics, Wheaton College, Wheaton, IL 60187 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7258-1102
Hui LiDepartment of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3139-2898
Yu JiDepartment of Breast Imaging, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 30060, China.
Peifang LiuDepartment of Breast Imaging, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 30060, China.
Maryellen L GigerDepartment of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5482-9728

Funding

Quantitative Image Analysis for Assessing Response to Breast Cancer TherapyU01CA195564 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GIGER, MARYELLEN L. · 2015 to 2019
$2.5M
Assessment of Repeatability and Robustness of Radiomics in Breast Cancer ImagingR15CA227948 · NCI · WHEATON COLLEGE · PI WHITNEY, HEATHER M · 2019 to 2019
$397k
Protected Radiomics Analysis Commons for Deep Learning in Biomedical DiscoveryS10OD025081 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GIGER, MARYELLEN L. · 2018 to 2018
$339k
NCI NIH HHS R15 CA227948NCI NIH HHS U01 CA195564NIH HHS S10 OD025081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital image-based signatures of breast tumors may ultimately contribute to the design of patient-specific breast cancer diagnostics and treatments. Beyond traditional human-engineered computer vision methods, tumor classification methods using transfer learning from deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are actively under development. This article will first discuss our progress in using CNN-based transfer learning to characterize breast tumors for various diagnostic, prognostic, or predictive image-based tasks across multiple imaging modalities, including mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, ultrasound (US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), compared to both human-engineered feature-based radiomics and fusion classifiers created through combination of such features. Second, a new study is presented that reports on a comprehensive comparison of the classification performances of features derived from human-engineered radiomic features, CNN transfer learning, and fusion classifiers for breast lesions imaged with MRI. These studies demonstrate the utility of transfer learning for computer-aided diagnosis and highlight the synergistic improvement in classification performance using fusion classifiers.

Indexed as

Breast cancercomputer-aided diagnosis (CADx)deep learningdynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)radiomicstransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID34045769
PMCPMC8152568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.