Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34045705›Full record

ReviewNature materials2021

From predictive modelling to machine learning and reverse engineering of colloidal self-assembly.

Marjolein Dijkstra, Erik Luijten

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature materials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A DNA-encoded recipe to direct multistage colloidal assembly.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Perspective: Thermophoresis and Its Promise for Optical Patterning.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Neural functional theory for inhomogeneous fluids: Fundamentals and applications.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marjolein DijkstraSoft Condensed Matter, Debye Institute for Nanomaterial Science, Department of Physics, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. M.Dijkstra@uu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9166-6478
Erik LuijtenDepartments of Materials Science and Engineering, Engineering Sciences & Applied Mathematics, Chemistry and Physics & Astronomy, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA. luijten@northwestern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2364-1866

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An overwhelming diversity of colloidal building blocks with distinct sizes, materials and tunable interaction potentials are now available for colloidal self-assembly. The application space for materials composed of these building blocks is vast. To make progress in the rational design of new self-assembled materials, it is desirable to guide the experimental synthesis efforts by computational modelling. Here, we discuss computer simulation methods and strategies used for the design of soft materials created through bottom-up self-assembly of colloids and nanoparticles. We describe simulation techniques for investigating the self-assembly behaviour of colloidal suspensions, including crystal structure prediction methods, phase diagram calculations and enhanced sampling techniques, as well as their limitations. We also discuss the recent surge of interest in machine learning and reverse-engineering methods. Although their implementation in the colloidal realm is still in its infancy, we anticipate that these data-science tools offer new paradigms in understanding, predicting and (inverse) design of novel colloidal materials.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.