Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34045688›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2022

Multidisciplinary approach and management of patients who seek medical advice for penile size concerns: a narrative review.

Nicolò Schifano, Omer Onur Cakir, Fabio Castiglione, Francesco Montorsi, Giulio Garaffa

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of impotence research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Reconstructive surgery of the scrotum: a systematic review.International journal of impotence research · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Male esthetic genital surgery: recommendations and gaps to be filled.International journal of impotence research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicolò SchifanoUniversità Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4828-4316
Omer Onur CakirInstitute of Andrology, Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.
Fabio CastiglioneInstitute of Andrology, Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.
Francesco MontorsiUniversità Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Giulio GaraffaAndrologia Internazionale Roma, Rome, Italy. giuliogaraffa@googlemail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9834-5098

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to provide an overview of the strategies available to manage patients concerned about their penile size and to provide useful surgical hints regarding the most common penile enlargement approaches, based on our surgical expertise in this field. A comprehensive research was carried out on MEDLINE/PubMed database to identify pertinent studies concerning penile enlargement issues. The search strategy included a range of keywords; e.g. penis, penile, enlargement, augmentation, lengthening, girth. Management of penile size-related concerns represents a real challenge for the urologist, especially when dealing with patients suffering from penile dysmorphophobic disorder (PDD). A multidisciplinary preoperative assessment, including a psychiatric/psychological evaluation, may help in discerning those patients who would benefit the most from counselling/conservative management from those who would benefit from surgery instead. Conservative approaches include the use of vacuum-based and penile-stretching devices, which have shown encouraging levels of efficacy and safety. Over the last decades, different surgical strategies have been developed, aimed at either increasing flaccid penile length or improving penile girth. Penile lengthening procedures are more established, and satisfactory results can be achieved by experienced, large referrals' volume, surgeons. To date, there is lack of consensus regarding the penile girth enhancing techniques, and therefore these should be regarded as experimental. A multidisciplinary approach is necessary to identify patients with PDD, who should not be offered surgical intervention and should be referred for psychiatric/psychological counselling instead. The surgical approach should be tailored to the subject's unique anatomy and underlying conditions.

Indexed as

Penile DiseasesPenile ProsthesisCounselingHumansMalePenisSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.